PURPOSE: Photodynamic therapy after intravenous injection of Photofrin (QLT Phototherapeutics, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) results in a contracted bladder and skin photosensitivity, which limits its clinical application. In an attempt to overcome these limitations photodynamic therapy after intravesical instillation of Photofrin or 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) in an orthotopic rat bladder tumor model was explored and compared with intravenous Photofrin for photodynamic therapy efficacy and phototoxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At 2 weeks after bladder implantation of 1.5 x 10(6) AY-27 tumor cells animals were randomly grouped. Photofrin was administered (5 mg./kg. intravenously and 2 mg./ml. intravesically). The ALA concentration for intravesical instillation was 300 mM. Whole bladder photodynamic therapy with graded doses of light (lambda = 630 nm.) was performed 4 hours after drug administration. Tumor control and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Photodynamic therapy with intravenous Photofrin plus 100 J./cm.(2) light resulted in severe bladder damage. Of 10 rats 6 died and 2 of the 10 that received 50 J./cm.(2) died. There were no photodynamic therapy related deaths in groups receiving intravesical instillation of Photofrin or ALA that also received 50 to 100 J./cm.(2) Median survival in rats treated with ALA intravesically plus 75 J./cm.(2) (77 days), Photofrin intravesically plus 50 (67) or 100 J./cm.(2) (76) and Photofrin intravenously plus 50 J./cm.(2) (60) were significantly different from that in controls (44). CONCLUSIONS: Intravesical instillation of Photofrin or ALA can achieve the same photodynamic therapy efficacy as intravenous Photofrin in this orthotopic rat bladder tumor model with less phototoxicity to normal tissues.
PURPOSE: Photodynamic therapy after intravenous injection of Photofrin (QLT Phototherapeutics, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) results in a contracted bladder and skin photosensitivity, which limits its clinical application. In an attempt to overcome these limitations photodynamic therapy after intravesical instillation of Photofrin or 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) in an orthotopic ratbladder tumor model was explored and compared with intravenous Photofrin for photodynamic therapy efficacy and phototoxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At 2 weeks after bladder implantation of 1.5 x 10(6) AY-27 tumor cells animals were randomly grouped. Photofrin was administered (5 mg./kg. intravenously and 2 mg./ml. intravesically). The ALA concentration for intravesical instillation was 300 mM. Whole bladder photodynamic therapy with graded doses of light (lambda = 630 nm.) was performed 4 hours after drug administration. Tumor control and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Photodynamic therapy with intravenous Photofrin plus 100 J./cm.(2) light resulted in severe bladder damage. Of 10 rats 6 died and 2 of the 10 that received 50 J./cm.(2) died. There were no photodynamic therapy related deaths in groups receiving intravesical instillation of Photofrin or ALA that also received 50 to 100 J./cm.(2) Median survival in rats treated with ALA intravesically plus 75 J./cm.(2) (77 days), Photofrin intravesically plus 50 (67) or 100 J./cm.(2) (76) and Photofrin intravenously plus 50 J./cm.(2) (60) were significantly different from that in controls (44). CONCLUSIONS: Intravesical instillation of Photofrin or ALA can achieve the same photodynamic therapy efficacy as intravenous Photofrin in this orthotopic ratbladder tumor model with less phototoxicity to normal tissues.
Authors: Craig E Grossman; Stephen Pickup; Amy Durham; E Paul Wileyto; Mary E Putt; Theresa M Busch Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: S W Pridgeon; R Heer; G A Taylor; D R Newell; K O'Toole; M Robinson; Y-Z Xu; P Karran; A V Boddy Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-05-24 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Lothar Lilge; Jenny Wu; Yiwen Xu; Angelica Manalac; Daniel Molehuis; Fynn Schwiegelshohn; Leonid Vesselov; Wayne Embree; Michael Nesbit; Vaughn Betz; Arkady Mandel; Michael A S Jewett; Girish S Kulkarni Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 3.170