Literature DB >> 12477985

Mechanisms of intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential changes.

Alan D Legatt1.   

Abstract

Brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) changes during intraoperative monitoring may reflect damage to or potentially reversible dysfunction of the ear, the eighth nerve, or the brainstem auditory pathways up to the level of the mesencephalon. They may also be caused by other physiologic mechanisms such as anesthesia, hypothermia, and acoustic masking from drilling noise, or they may result from technical factors that prevent proper stimulus delivery or recording of an evoked potential that is actually present. Cochlear ischemia or infarction resulting from compromise of the internal auditory artery and inner ear damage during temporal bone drilling will affect all BAEP components, including wave I. Direct mechanical or thermal trauma to the eighth nerve will delay, attenuate, and possibly eliminate waves III and V, but wave I, which is generated at the cochlear end of the eighth nerve, may be preserved. During scraping of tumor off the eighth nerve, force applied in an ear-toward-brainstem direction can avulse the fragile fibers of the distal eighth nerve at the area cribrosa. Prolonging the I-to-III interpeak interval during retraction of the cerebellum and brainstem reflects stretching of the eighth nerve, and is often reversible. Vasospasm within the eighth nerve can cause similar, potentially reversible BAEP changes. Damage to the brainstem auditory pathways at or below the level of the mesencephalon will delay and attenuate or eliminate wave V. Wave III is affected similarly if the damage is at or caudal to the region of the superior olivary complex. These BAEP changes may reflect direct mechanical or thermal damage to the brainstem, brainstem compression, or ischemia or infarction resulting from vascular compromise. During BAEP monitoring, examination of the pattern of BAEP changes, analysis of their correlation with surgical maneuvers, and investigation for possible contributory technical factors can help to determine the cause of the BAEP changes and provide the appropriate information to the rest of the surgical team.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12477985     DOI: 10.1097/00004691-200210000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  19 in total

1.  The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem.

Authors:  Jaime A Undurraga; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-12

Review 2.  Surgery of the ear and the lateral skull base: pitfalls and complications.

Authors:  Bernhard Schick; Julia Dlugaiczyk
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

Review 3.  Brainstem Monitoring in the Neurocritical Care Unit: A Rationale for Real-Time, Automated Neurophysiological Monitoring.

Authors:  James L Stone; Julian E Bailes; Ahmed N Hassan; Brian Sindelar; Vimal Patel; John Fino
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Rapid Increase in Neural Conduction Time in the Adult Human Auditory Brainstem Following Sudden Unilateral Deafness.

Authors:  M R D Maslin; S K Lloyd; S Rutherford; S Freeman; A King; D R Moore; K J Munro
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-09

5.  Monitoring motor function during resection of tumours in the lower brain stem and fourth ventricle.

Authors:  Sven Gläsker; Ulrich Pechstein; Vassilios I Vougioukas; Vera Van Velthoven
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Differential actions of isoflurane and ketamine-based anaesthetics on cochlear function in the mouse.

Authors:  Jennie M E Cederholm; Kristina E Froud; Ann C Y Wong; Myungseo Ko; Allen F Ryan; Gary D Housley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  High stimulus rate brainstem auditory evoked potential in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

Authors:  Juan-Wen He; Qiang Gong; Xue-Feng Wang; Zheng Xiao
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Nitrous oxide and isoflurane are synergistic with respect to amplitude and latency effects on sensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Tod Sloan; H Sloan; J Rogers
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Microvascular decompression of cochlear nerve for tinnitus incapacity: pre-surgical data, surgical analyses and long-term follow-up of 15 patients.

Authors:  Nicolas Guevara; Arnaud Deveze; Valeriu Buza; Benoît Laffont; Jacques Magnan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  The role of GTF2IRD1 in the auditory pathology of Williams-Beuren Syndrome.

Authors:  Cesar P Canales; Ann C Y Wong; Peter W Gunning; Gary D Housley; Edna C Hardeman; Stephen J Palmer
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.