Literature DB >> 12477644

Estimating the incidence of influenza-virus infections in Dutch weaned piglets using blood samples from a cross-sectional study.

W L A Loeffen1, G Nodelijk, P P Heinen, L A M G van Leengoed, W A Hunneman, J H M Verheijden.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was carried out on 32 Dutch breeding herds to estimate the incidence of influenza-virus infections in piglets before the start of the finishing period, at the age of approximately 10 weeks. Longitudinal studies on two herds (8 and 10 litters, respectively) were done to obtain an average decay function for maternal antibodies.Each participating farm in the cross-sectional study was visited twice within 5 months; each time, blood samples were taken randomly from one compartment (a separate room with separate air flow) of 4-5-week-old piglets and one compartment of 8-9-week-old piglets. These blood samples (a total of 2598; 16-23 per compartment, depending on its size) were tested in a haemagglutination inhibition test for antibodies against influenza-virus subtypes H1 and H3. Samples from 8-9-week-old piglets from the first sampling period (n=660) were also tested in an IgM ELISA. For each individual herd and each influenza-virus subtype separately, the decay function derived from the longitudinal studies was used to calculate an expected seroprevalence in 8-9-week-old piglets, which was then compared to the observed seroprevalence. Depending on subtype and sampling period, between 10 and 15 of the 32 herds were suspected of virus circulation during the weaning period because the observed seroprevalence was significantly higher than the expected seroprevalence (P<0.05). In the first sampling period the IgM ELISA confirmed six of these outbreaks. However, due to the small window of detection of the IgM ELISA (compared to the length of the weaning period), it will always underestimate the number of infections. Infections in the first half of the weaning period will no longer be detectable because IgM antibodies have already disappeared. In individual pigs, an incidence of 16-17% was estimated for each subtype over a 4-week period between the age of 4-5 and 8-9 weeks. For each influenza subtype, 80% of the piglets will enter the finishing facilities without antibodies or with decaying maternal antibodies. These piglets may be susceptible to an infection with influenza virus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12477644     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00306-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  17 in total

1.  A cross-sectional study of swine influenza in intensive and extensive farms in the northeastern region of the state of São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Henrique Meiroz de Souza Almeida; Gabriel Yuri Storino; Daniele Araújo Pereira; Igor Renan Honorato Gatto; Luis Antonio Mathias; Hélio José Montassier; Luís Guilherme de Oliveira
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Field efficacy of an inactivated bivalent influenza vaccine in a multi-site swine production system during an outbreak of systemic porcine circovirus associated disease.

Authors:  Zvonimir Poljak; Catherine E Dewey; S Wayne Martin; Jette Christensen; Robert M Friendship
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Efficient isolation of Swine influenza viruses by age-targeted specimen collection.

Authors:  Makoto Ozawa; Aya Matsuu; Kouki Yonezawa; Manabu Igarashi; Kosuke Okuya; Toshiko Kawabata; Kimihito Ito; Kyoko Tsukiyama-Kohara; Akira Taneno; Eisaburo Deguchi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Prevalence of and risk factors for influenza in southern Ontario swine herds in 2001 and 2003.

Authors:  Zvonimir Poljak; Catherine E Dewey; S Wayne Martin; Jette Christensen; Susy Carman; Robert M Friendship
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.310

5.  Longitudinal study of influenza A virus circulation in a nursery swine barn.

Authors:  Juliana B Ferreira; Helena Grgić; Robert Friendship; Greg Wideman; Éva Nagy; Zvonimir Poljak
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.683

6.  Prevalence and risk factors for swine influenza virus infection in the English pig population.

Authors:  Alexander Mastin; Pablo Alarcon; Dirk Pfeiffer; James Wood; Susanna Williamson; Ian Brown; Barbara Wieland
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2011-02-11

7.  Swine influenza virus infection dynamics in two pig farms; results of a longitudinal assessment.

Authors:  Meritxell Simon-Grifé; Gerard E Martín-Valls; María J Vilar; Núria Busquets; Mercedes Mora-Salvatierra; Theo M Bestebroer; Ron Am Fouchier; Margarita Martín; Enric Mateu; Jordi Casal
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.683

8.  Swine influenza virus infection in different age groups of pigs in farrow-to-finish farms in Thailand.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Takemae; Sujira Parchariyanon; Ruttapong Ruttanapumma; Yasuaki Hiromoto; Tsuyoshi Hayashi; Yuko Uchida; Takehiko Saito
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.099

9.  Distribution of antibodies against influenza virus in pigs from farrow-to-finish farms in Minas Gerais state, Brazil.

Authors:  Alessandra S Dias; Érica A Costa; Daniela S Rajão; Roberto M C Guedes; Janice R Ciacci Zanella; Zélia I P Lobato
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.380

10.  Distinction of subtype-specific antibodies against European porcine influenza viruses by indirect ELISA based on recombinant hemagglutinin protein fragment-1.

Authors:  Na Zhao; Elke Lange; Sybille Kubald; Christian Grund; Martin Beer; Timm C Harder
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 4.099

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.