Literature DB >> 12477613

Evaluating participants' use of a hormone replacement therapy decision-making intervention.

Lori A Bastian1, Colleen M McBride, Laura Fish, Pauline Lyna, David Farrell, Isaac M Lipkus, Barbara K Rimer, Ilene C Siegler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Associations between optimal use of a tailored decision-aid and levels of accuracy of perceived breast cancer risk, confidence in decision-making, and satisfaction with decisions about HRT were evaluated in a randomized intervention trial with a community sample of women aged 45-54.
METHODS: Data are from 289 women randomized to receive a computer-tailored three-step decision-aid.
RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of participants reported optimal use of the intervention materials. African American women and those with low confidence in decision-making were less likely to use the intervention optimally than white women and those with higher confidence (P<0.05). Optimal use of the decision-aid was associated with increased accuracy of perceived risk and confidence to make a decision. DISCUSSION: When used optimally, self-directed decision-aids can improve women's ability to make decisions about HRT. Additional refinement of these aids is needed. For some subgroups of women, adjuncts such as telephone counseling also might be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12477613     DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00048-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  5 in total

1.  A tailored intervention to aid decision-making about hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Lori A Bastian; Susan Halabi; Laura Fish; Isaac M Lipkus; Hayden B Bosworth; Barbara K Rimer; Ilene C Siegler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  A systematic review of information in decision aids.

Authors:  Deb Feldman-Stewart; Sarah Brennenstuhl; Kathryn McIssac; Joan Austoker; Agathe Charvet; Paul Hewitson; Karen R Sepucha; Tim Whelan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): trial protocol.

Authors:  Eleanor Mann; A Toby Prevost; Simon Griffin; Ian Kellar; Stephen Sutton; Michael Parker; Simon Sanderson; Ann Louise Kinmonth; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Time to decide about risk-reducing mastectomy: a case series of BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers.

Authors:  Mary McCullum; Joan L Bottorff; Mary Kelly; Stephanie A Kieffer; Lynda G Balneaves
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Factors explaining the heterogeneity of effects of patient decision aids on knowledge of outcome probabilities: a systematic review sub-analysis.

Authors:  Stephen J Gentles; Dawn Stacey; Carol Bennett; Mohamad Alshurafa; Stephen D Walter
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.