Literature DB >> 12477583

A comparison of the remifentanil and fentanyl adverse effect profile in a multicenter phase IV study.

Girish P Joshi1, David S Warner, Rebecca S Twersky, Lee A Fleisher.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of adverse effects of remifentanil and fentanyl in a large and diverse patient population.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, open-label study.
SETTING: Multicenter study including academic and community hospitals. PATIENTS: 2,438 adult patients (1,496 outpatients and 942 inpatients) scheduled for elective surgical procedures under general endotracheal anesthesia of at least 30-minute duration.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous (IV) remifentanil (n = 1,229) 0.5 microg/kg/min for induction and tracheal intubation followed by an infusion rate of 0.25 microg/kg/min or fentanyl (n = 1,209) administered according to the anesthesiologist's usual practice. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol and/or isoflurane (with or without nitrous oxide) titrated according to protocol. Transition analgesia with either morphine or fentanyl was administered in the remifentanil and, at the anesthesiologist's discretion, in the fentanyl group. MEASUREMENTS: The overall nonspecific and specific (i.e., opioid-related) adverse effects were recorded. MAIN
RESULTS: Remifentanil was associated with more intraoperative hypotension than fentanyl (p < 0.05). All four cases (0.3%) of muscle rigidity occurred in the remifentanil-treated outpatients. There were no significant differences between the two drugs with respect to other adverse events (i.e., episodes of hypertension, bradycardia, respiratory depression, and apnea).
CONCLUSIONS: In the doses used, both remifentanil and fentanyl have a similar frequency of adverse effects except for the higher frequency of hypotension associated with the use of remifentanil. Copyright 2002 by Elsevier Science Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12477583     DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00404-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of the effects of ketamine or lidocaine on fentanyl-induced cough in patients undergoing surgery: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Gülen Guler; Recep Aksu; Cihangir Bicer; Zeynep Tosun; Adem Boyaci
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2010-10

Review 2.  Remifentanil: a review of its use during the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  The proper effect site concentration of remifentanil for prevention of myoclonus after etomidate injection.

Authors:  Hyun Su Ri; Sang Wook Shin; Tae Kyun Kim; Seung Wan Baik; Ji Uk Yoon; Gyeong Jo Byeon
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-08-23

Review 4.  Spotlight on remifentanil for general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Comparison of the effectiveness of lidocaine and salbutamol on coughing provoked by intravenous remifentanil during anesthesia induction.

Authors:  Si-Ra Bang; Hyun Joo Ahn; Hyo Jin Kim; Gunn Hee Kim; Jie Ae Kim; Mikyung Yang; Jin-Kyoung Kim; Hyun-Sung Cho
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-11-25

6.  Remifentanil versus fentanyl compared in a target-controlled infusion of propofol anesthesia: quality of anesthesia and recovery profile.

Authors:  Demet Coskun; Hulya Celebi; Gozde Karaca; Lale Karabiyik
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 7.  Remifentanil update: clinical science and utility.

Authors:  Richard Beers; Enrico Camporesi
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  Pre-administration of remifentanil in target-controlled propofol and remifentanil anesthesia prolongs anesthesia induction in neurosurgical patients: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jin Hee Ahn; Doyeon Kim; Ik Soo Chung; Jeong Jin Lee; Eun Kyung Lee; Ji Seon Jeong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Antihistamine pretreatment to reduce incidence of withdrawal movement after rocuronium injection.

Authors:  Ho Jun Lee; Sung Jin Han; Heezoo Kim; Il Ok Lee; Myoung Hoon Kong; Nan Suk Kim; Sang Ho Lim; Mi Kyoung Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Pharmacists leadership in a medication shortage response: Illustrative examples from a health system response to the COVID-19 crisis.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Ammar; Lydia J Tran; Bryan McGill; Abdalla A Ammar; Phu Huynh; Nilesh Amin; Michael Guerra; Ginger E Rouse; Diana Lemieux; Dayna McManus; Jeffrey E Topal; Matthew W Davis; LeeAnn Miller; Marina Yazdi; Molly Billstein Leber; Rebecca A Pulk
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Pharm       Date:  2021-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.