Literature DB >> 12477049

Pretreatment deoxycytidine kinase levels predict in vivo gemcitabine sensitivity.

Judith R Kroep1, Willem J P Loves, Clasina L van der Wilt, Enrique Alvarez, Iannis Talianidis, Epie Boven, Boudewijn J M Braakhuis, Cornelis J van Groeningen, Herbert M Pinedo, Godefridus J Peters.   

Abstract

Deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) is essential for the phosphorylation of gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine), a deoxycytidine analogue active against various solid tumors. Cytidine deaminase (CDA) catalyzes the degradation of gemcitabine. We determined whether dCK and/or CDA levels would predict response to gemcitabine. Activities of dCK and CDA were measured in a panel of eight gemcitabine-sensitive and -resistant tumors of a different origin (pancreas, lung, colon, ovary, and head and neck) grown as s.c. tumors in mice. Sensitivity to gemcitabine was expressed as treated versus control (tumor volume treated mice/control mice). Gemcitabine was given on days 0, 3, 6, and 9 (q3dx4) at its maximum tolerated dose. In addition, we measured the mRNA expression and protein levels of dCK in seven human tumor xenografts. dCK activity (mean +/- SE) ranged from 3.3+/-0.3 to 18.4+/-1.2 nmol/h/mg protein. Sensitivity to gemcitabine, expressed as treated versus control, ranged from 0.98 to 0.02, and the activity of CDA varied from 2+/-2 to 411+/-4 nmol/h/mg protein. In contrast to CDA, dCK activity was clearly related to gemcitabine sensitivity (p = -0.93; P < 0.001). This indicates that dCK might be an important prognostic marker for gemcitabine sensitivity. Protein levels were significantly related to both dCK activity (r = 0.96; P < 0.001) and gemcitabine sensitivity (rho = -0.96; P < 0.001). dCK expression as determined by competitive template reverse transcriptase PCR was significantly related with the dCK activity (r = 0.88; P = 0.025) and protein levels (p = 0.80; P = 0.052) but not with gemcitabine sensitivity, suggesting a post-translational regulation of dCK. In conclusion, the clear correlation between dCK levels and gemcitabine sensitivity in various murine tumors and human tumor xenografts may be a prognostic parameter when considering gemcitabine therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12477049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1535-7163            Impact factor:   6.261


  58 in total

1.  Immunohistochemical and genetic evaluation of deoxycytidine kinase in pancreatic cancer: relationship to molecular mechanisms of gemcitabine resistance and survival.

Authors:  Valeria Sebastiani; Francesca Ricci; Belen Rubio-Viqueira; Belen Rubio-Viquiera; Piotr Kulesza; Charles J Yeo; Manuel Hidalgo; Alison Klein; Daniel Laheru; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Novel deoxycytidine kinase gene polymorphisms: a population screening study in Caucasian healthy volunteers.

Authors:  M Joerger; T M Bosch; V D Doodeman; J H Beijnen; P H M Smits; J H M Schellens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Pharmacogenetics and pharmacoepigenetics of gemcitabine.

Authors:  M Candelaria; E de la Cruz-Hernández; E Pérez-Cárdenas; C Trejo-Becerril; O Gutiérrez-Hernández; A Dueñas-González
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms of gemcitabine metabolic genes and pancreatic cancer survival and drug toxicity.

Authors:  Taro Okazaki; Milind Javle; Motofumi Tanaka; James L Abbruzzese; Donghui Li
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Overcoming nucleoside analog chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer: a therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  Sau Wai Hung; Hardik R Mody; Rajgopal Govindarajan
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of novel lipophilic monophosphorylated gemcitabine derivatives and their nanoparticles.

Authors:  Dharmika S P Lansakara-P; B Leticia Rodriguez; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 7.  Adjuvant pharmacotherapy in the management of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Raphaël Maréchal; Anne Demols; Jean-Luc Van Laethem
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Aptamer-mediated delivery of chemotherapy to pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Partha Ray; Marcus A Cheek; Mariam L Sharaf; Na Li; Andrew D Ellington; Bruce A Sullenger; Barbara Ramsay Shaw; Rebekah R White
Journal:  Nucleic Acid Ther       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.486

9.  Increased sensitivity to gemcitabine of P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein-overexpressing human cancer cell lines.

Authors:  A M Bergman; H M Pinedo; I Talianidis; G Veerman; W J P Loves; C L van der Wilt; G J Peters
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-06-16       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Paclitaxel alters the expression and specific activity of deoxycytidine kinase and cytidine deaminase in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Stacy S Shord; Shitalben R Patel
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.