Literature DB >> 12477021

Clinical performance of the Reichert AT550: a new non-contact tonometer.

J Jorge1, J A Díaz-Rey, J M González-Méijome, J B Almeida, M A Parafita.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the level of accuracy for measurements of intra-ocular pressure (IOP) obtained with a new non-contact tonometer (NCT) the Reichert AT550. Measurements were compared against those obtained with the Reichert Xpert Plus, Goldmann applanation tonometer and Perkins tonometer. Thirty-five university students were assessed with the four tonometers in a randomised order, with non-contact tonometry performed first. Each of the four measurement devices had its own trained clinical observer. Plots of differences of IOP as a function of the mean for each pair of instruments were obtained. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing the AT550 NCT with contact applanation tonometry (AT) (p> 0.05), displaying the closest level of agreement (as represented by the lowest mean difference and the narrowest confidence interval) with the Goldmann tonometer (limits of agreement, 0.12+/-2.17). In conclusion, readings of IOP with the AT550 NCT are clinically comparable with those obtained with Goldmann tonometry in a population with IOP within the normal range.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12477021     DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00077.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  13 in total

1.  Repeatability of intra-ocular pressure and central corneal thickness measurements provided by a non-contact method of tonometry and pachymetry.

Authors:  Domenico Schiano Lomoriello; Marco Lombardo; Laura Tranchina; Francesco Oddone; Sebastiano Serrao; Pietro Ducoli
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.

Authors:  P-A Tonnu; T Ho; K Sharma; E White; C Bunce; D Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Rebound tonometry: new opportunities and limitations of non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure.

Authors:  A Cervino
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 4.  Tonometers-which one should I use?

Authors:  Kanza Aziz; David S Friedman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Age differences in central and peripheral intraocular pressure using a rebound tonometer.

Authors:  J M González-Méijome; J Jorge; A Queirós; P Fernandes; R Montés-Micó; J B Almeida; M A Parafita
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the portable PT100 noncontact tonometer and goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Sarwat Salim; Daniel J Linn; James R Echols; Peter A Netland
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06-02

7.  Performance of the PT100 noncontact tonometer in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Turki M AlMubrad
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-19

8.  Ocular surface displacement with and without contact lenses during non-contact tonometry.

Authors:  Ulfah Rimayanti; Yoshiaki Kiuchi; Shohei Uemura; Joji Takenaka; Hideki Mochizuki; Makoto Kaneko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Detecting IOP Fluctuations in Glaucoma Patients.

Authors:  Brenda Nuyen; Kaweh Mansouri
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2016-02-29

10.  The applicability of correction factor for corneal thickness on non-contact tonometer measured intraocular pressure in LASIK treated eyes.

Authors:  Jitendra Jethani; Paaraj Dave; Monica Jethani; Yogesh Desai; Purvi Patel
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.