Literature DB >> 12476521

Needle suspension procedures for female incontinence.

Dawn M Bodell1, Gary E Leach.   

Abstract

In the past, needle suspensions were considered a viable option to treat female stress urinary incontinence. There have been many modifications since the first needle suspension over 40 years ago. Despite these modifications, the long-term outcome data does not support the efficacy of needle suspension procedures, with only a 67% cure/dry rate at > 48 months. The long-term results are much more efficacious with the sling procedure (83%), as well as with retropubic suspensions (84%). Needle suspensions have historical significance, but because of the poor long-term results, they currently have a limited role in the management of stress urinary incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12476521     DOI: 10.1016/s0094-0143(02)00073-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  3 in total

1.  Joint report on the terminology for surgical procedures to treat stress urinary incontinence in women.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  The role of duloxetine in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jinhong Li; Lu Yang; Chunxiao Pu; Yin Tang; Haichao Yun; Ping Han
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Duloxetine versus placebo for the treatment of women with stress predominant urinary incontinence in Taiwan: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Alex Tong-Long Lin; Mou-Jong Sun; Hui-Lung Tai; Yao Chi Chuang; Shih-Tsung Huang; Nick Wang; Yan Daniel Zhao; Julie Beyrer; Meghan Wulster-Radcliffe; Louise Levine; Curtis Chang; Lars Viktrup
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 2.264

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.