Literature DB >> 12476279

Transplantation as salvage therapy for high-risk patients with myeloma in relapse.

C-K Lee1, B Barlogie, M Zangari, A Fassas, E Anaissie, C Morris, F Van Rhee, M Cottler-Fox, R Thertulien, F Muwalla, S Mazher, A Badros, G Tricot.   

Abstract

Patients with myeloma relapsing after tandem transplant have a poor survival and treatment options are limited. The role of additional salvage transplant procedures for these patients is unknown. To evaluate the benefit and identify prognostic factors, the outcome of 76 consecutive patients with recurrent myeloma after tandem transplant receiving salvage transplants (ST) was analyzed. Prior to ST, 23 patients (30%) had shown chemosensitive response to preceding salvage chemotherapy: two complete remissions (CR); eight near CRs (nCR: only immunofixation positive); 13 partial remissions (PR >or=75% reduction in M protein). Fifty received an autologous transplant, 22 a sibling-matched allogeneic transplant, and four a matched-unrelated allogeneic transplant. Overall response after ST was 59%: eight CRs (11%); 14 nCRs (18%); 23 PRs (30%). Overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 19%; 2 year event-free survival rate (EFS) 7%. On univariate analysis for survival, only pre-transplant chemosensitive relapse (P < 0.05), serum albumin >3 g/dl (P = 0.001), normal LDH (P = 0.04), and long interval between the second transplant and relapse/progression were significant beneficial factors. In a Cox proportional hazard model, chemosensitive relapse, and albumin >3 g/dl were significant for better OS: hazard ratio (HR) 1.4, 1.7, respectively, while normal LDH, and absence of CA13 were significant for better EFS: HR 1.8, 1.7, respectively. Patients with albumin >3 g/dl who had chemosensitive disease before ST (n = 16) had a median survival of 16 months, compared to 7 months (n = 34) and 2 months (n = 26) for patients with only one (n = 34) or no favorable prognostic factors (n = 28), respectively (P < 0.001). Their survival at 2 years post-ST was 43%, 17% and 11%, respectively. Our study suggests further transplantation should only be considered in the setting of a clinical trial in patients with favorable prognostic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12476279     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Christian Gerecke; Stephan Fuhrmann; Susanne Strifler; Martin Schmidt-Hieber; Hermann Einsele; Stefan Knop
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Novel treatment approaches for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Rajni Sinha; Sagar Lonial
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2006-05

3.  Cytogenetically defined myelodysplasia after melphalan-based autotransplantation for multiple myeloma linked to poor hematopoietic stem-cell mobilization: the Arkansas experience in more than 3,000 patients treated since 1989.

Authors:  Bart Barlogie; Guido Tricot; Jeff Haessler; Frits van Rhee; Michele Cottler-Fox; Elias Anaissie; James Waldron; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Raymond Thertulien; Maurizio Zangari; Klaus Hollmig; Abid Mohiuddin; Yazan Alsayed; Antje Hoering; John Crowley; Jeffrey Sawyer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  The changing landscape of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM): fundamentals and controversies.

Authors:  José-Ángel Hernández-Rivas; Rafael Ríos-Tamayo; Cristina Encinas; Rafael Alonso; Juan-José Lahuerta
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2022-01-09

5.  Outcomes of salvage autologous versus allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed multiple myeloma after initial autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Baldeep Wirk; Michael Byrne; Yunfeng Dai; Jan S Moreb
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2013-04-23

6.  Rationale and design of the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG) trial ReLApsE: a randomized, open, multicenter phase III trial of lenalidomide/dexamethasone versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone plus subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Marc-Andrea Baertsch; Jana Schlenzka; Elias K Mai; Maximilian Merz; Jens Hillengaß; Marc S Raab; Dirk Hose; Patrick Wuchter; Anthony D Ho; Anna Jauch; Thomas Hielscher; Christina Kunz; Steffen Luntz; Stefan Klein; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf; Martin Goerner; Martin Schmidt-Hieber; Peter Reimer; Ullrich Graeven; Roland Fenk; Hans Salwender; Christof Scheid; Axel Nogai; Mathias Haenel; Hans W Lindemann; Hans Martin; Richard Noppeney; Katja Weisel; Hartmut Goldschmidt
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.