Louis-Philippe Boulet1, Véronique Boulet, Joanne Milot. 1. Centre de recherche de l'Hôpital Laval, Institut de cardiologie et de pneumologie de l'Université Laval, 2725 chemin Sainte-Foy, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada. lpboulet@med.ulaval.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current asthma guidelines suggest a series of criteria to assess if asthma is controlled. However, there is a need to develop a simple and practical method to quantify the degree of such control, both in clinical practice and research. STUDY OBJECTIVES: This report describes a new method to quantify asthma control based on a percentage score. It also aims at comparing the percentage scores obtained with patient's self-evaluation of asthma control and a current validated Mini Asthma Quality of Life (MAQOL) questionnaire. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Forty-two subjects (25 female and 17 male patients) with asthma of different severity recruited from a tertiary center asthma clinic. METHODS: The asthma scoring method provided a percentage control for symptoms, baseline expiratory flows and, an optional parameter, for airway inflammation assessed from induced-sputum eosinophil count. These control parameters were compared to an overall assessment of asthma control by the patient (also on a 100% scale) and the score obtained from a validated MAQOL questionnaire. RESULTS: Mean +/- SEM scores for symptoms, expiratory flows, and airway eosinophilia (last 2 weeks) were 87.8 +/- 1.4%, 88.6 +/- 1.8%, and 66.2 +/- 3.9%, respectively. No significant correlation was found between these three parameters (p > 0.05). The mean global asthma control score and the score estimated by the patient were 80.9 +/- 1.5% and 91.7 +/- 1.5%, respectively (not significantly different). There was a significant correlation between asthma control score (percentage) and percentage symptom score (p < 0.001), while it almost achieved significance for FEV(1) (p = 0.05). Only symptom scores correlated with the MAQOL questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a simple easy-to-use asthma control scoring system based on a percentage of optimal control. The percentage symptom score but not the global control score of this new method correlated with patient's global assessment of asthma control. This could be a simple tool that is potentially useful both for the clinician and for research purposes, to quantify global or specific aspects of asthma control.
BACKGROUND: Current asthma guidelines suggest a series of criteria to assess if asthma is controlled. However, there is a need to develop a simple and practical method to quantify the degree of such control, both in clinical practice and research. STUDY OBJECTIVES: This report describes a new method to quantify asthma control based on a percentage score. It also aims at comparing the percentage scores obtained with patient's self-evaluation of asthma control and a current validated Mini Asthma Quality of Life (MAQOL) questionnaire. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Forty-two subjects (25 female and 17 male patients) with asthma of different severity recruited from a tertiary center asthma clinic. METHODS: The asthma scoring method provided a percentage control for symptoms, baseline expiratory flows and, an optional parameter, for airway inflammation assessed from induced-sputum eosinophil count. These control parameters were compared to an overall assessment of asthma control by the patient (also on a 100% scale) and the score obtained from a validated MAQOL questionnaire. RESULTS: Mean +/- SEM scores for symptoms, expiratory flows, and airway eosinophilia (last 2 weeks) were 87.8 +/- 1.4%, 88.6 +/- 1.8%, and 66.2 +/- 3.9%, respectively. No significant correlation was found between these three parameters (p > 0.05). The mean global asthma control score and the score estimated by the patient were 80.9 +/- 1.5% and 91.7 +/- 1.5%, respectively (not significantly different). There was a significant correlation between asthma control score (percentage) and percentage symptom score (p < 0.001), while it almost achieved significance for FEV(1) (p = 0.05). Only symptom scores correlated with the MAQOL questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a simple easy-to-use asthma control scoring system based on a percentage of optimal control. The percentage symptom score but not the global control score of this new method correlated with patient's global assessment of asthma control. This could be a simple tool that is potentially useful both for the clinician and for research purposes, to quantify global or specific aspects of asthma control.
Authors: Michelle M Cloutier; Michael Schatz; Mario Castro; Noreen Clark; H William Kelly; Rita Mangione-Smith; James Sheller; Christine Sorkness; Stuart Stoloff; Peter Gergen Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Carlos A Camargo; G R Scott Budinger; Gabriel J Escobar; Nadia N Hansel; Corrine K Hanson; Gary B Huffnagle; A Sonia Buist Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2014-04
Authors: Lotte van den Nieuwenhof; Tjard Schermer; Marianne Heins; Joke Grootens; Petra Eysink; Ben Bottema; Chris van Weel; Patrick Bindels Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Nicola A Hanania; Monroe J King; Sidney S Braman; Carol Saltoun; Robert A Wise; Paul Enright; Ann R Falsey; Sameer K Mathur; Joe W Ramsdell; Linda Rogers; David A Stempel; John J Lima; James E Fish; Sandra R Wilson; Cynthia Boyd; Kushang V Patel; Charles G Irvin; Barbara P Yawn; Ethan A Halm; Stephen I Wasserman; Mark F Sands; William B Ershler; Dennis K Ledford Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Luis Nogueira-Silva; Sonia V Martins; Ricardo Cruz-Correia; Luis F Azevedo; Mario Morais-Almeida; António Bugalho-Almeida; Marianela Vaz; Altamiro Costa-Pereira; Joao A Fonseca Journal: Respir Res Date: 2009-06-17