AIM: The objectives of this study were to identify prognostic features for patients with hepatic metastases and unknown primary neoplasms (UPN), determine the common primary tumours, assess the value of diagnostic tests in finding these tumours, and evaluate the impact of therapy and knowledge of the primary tumour on patient survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with UPN and liver biopsy proven hepatic metastases over a 10-year period were reviewed (M:F, 58:30; age range 27-91 years, median 64.5 years). Histopathology, diagnostic investigations and success at identifying the primary neoplasm were recorded. In addition, in 70 patients with adenocarcinoma histology (M:F, 48:22; age range 27-91 years, median 65 years), treatment and survival data from the date of biopsy were recorded. RESULTS: The histological spectrum included adenocarcinoma in 70, neuroendocrine in four, squamous cell carcinoma in four, small cell carcinoma in four, carcinoid in two, hepatoma in one and three others. Extensive investigation identified a primary neoplasm in 16/88 patients (18%) including colorectal in six, gastric in two, lung in four, oesophageal in two, prostate in one and carcinoid in one. In the adenocarcinoma group survival data were available for 62/70 patients. Sixteen of 62 patients received active treatment with either surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or a combination protocol. Forty-six of 62 patients received palliative care alone. Median survival for the adenocarcinoma group overall was 49 days. The median survival for treated patients (49 days) versus untreated patients (52 days) was not significantly different (P=0.128). Patients <65 years were more likely to receive active treatment than those >65 years (P=0.006). Age with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.01 (P=0.178), active treatment (HR=0.65;P=0.194), knowledge of the primary neoplasm (HR=0.60;P=0.213) and male gender (HR=0.88;P=0.642) had no significant effect on survival. CONCLUSION: Although hepatic metastases are associated with poor prognosis, it is essential that a liver biopsy be performed to obtain a histological diagnosis. Adenocarcinoma metastases carry a dismal prognosis, and no prognostic factors, including knowledge of the primary tumour, are significant for patient survival. Extensive investigation is not warranted in patients with adenocarcinoma liver metastases.
AIM: The objectives of this study were to identify prognostic features for patients with hepatic metastases and unknown primary neoplasms (UPN), determine the common primary tumours, assess the value of diagnostic tests in finding these tumours, and evaluate the impact of therapy and knowledge of the primary tumour on patient survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with UPN and liver biopsy proven hepatic metastases over a 10-year period were reviewed (M:F, 58:30; age range 27-91 years, median 64.5 years). Histopathology, diagnostic investigations and success at identifying the primary neoplasm were recorded. In addition, in 70 patients with adenocarcinoma histology (M:F, 48:22; age range 27-91 years, median 65 years), treatment and survival data from the date of biopsy were recorded. RESULTS: The histological spectrum included adenocarcinoma in 70, neuroendocrine in four, squamous cell carcinoma in four, small cell carcinoma in four, carcinoid in two, hepatoma in one and three others. Extensive investigation identified a primary neoplasm in 16/88 patients (18%) including colorectal in six, gastric in two, lung in four, oesophageal in two, prostate in one and carcinoid in one. In the adenocarcinoma group survival data were available for 62/70 patients. Sixteen of 62 patients received active treatment with either surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or a combination protocol. Forty-six of 62 patients received palliative care alone. Median survival for the adenocarcinoma group overall was 49 days. The median survival for treated patients (49 days) versus untreated patients (52 days) was not significantly different (P=0.128). Patients <65 years were more likely to receive active treatment than those >65 years (P=0.006). Age with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.01 (P=0.178), active treatment (HR=0.65;P=0.194), knowledge of the primary neoplasm (HR=0.60;P=0.213) and male gender (HR=0.88;P=0.642) had no significant effect on survival. CONCLUSION: Although hepatic metastases are associated with poor prognosis, it is essential that a liver biopsy be performed to obtain a histological diagnosis. Adenocarcinoma metastases carry a dismal prognosis, and no prognostic factors, including knowledge of the primary tumour, are significant for patient survival. Extensive investigation is not warranted in patients with adenocarcinoma liver metastases.