Literature DB >> 12474528

Mode of presentation of renal cell carcinoma provides prognostic information.

Cheryl T Lee1, Jared Katz, Paul A Fearn, Paul Russo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Broadened applications of imaging modalities have increased the incidental detection of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) over the past decade. Previous small series have suggested a prognostic benefit for incidental presentation. This study utilizes a large contemporary patient cohort to examine patterns of RCC presentation and their clinical implications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on 721 patients (260 women, 461 men) who underwent 750 nephrectomies for treatment of RCC between 7/1/89 and 12/31/97; 29 patients required two operations for bilateral RCC. Median age and follow-up were 63 years and 41 months, respectively. Indicators of symptomatic presentation included flank pain, flank mass, hematuria, varicocele, constitutional symptoms, paraneoplastic syndromes, and bone pain related to metastatic disease. Mode of presentation was compared with clinicopathologic parameters using Chi-square and t-test analyses. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates (log-rank test) and Cox regression modeling.
RESULTS: Incidental and symptomatic presentation occurred in 57% and 42% of cases, respectively. When compared to incidental cases, symptomatic presentation was predominantly detected in younger patients (mean age, 59 years; P < .001), in males (P < .04), and in tumors with conventional (clear cell) histology (P < .001), larger size (mean, 8 cm; P < .001), and non-organ confined pathology (P < .001). In univariate analysis, symptomatic cases had a more adverse disease-free (P < .0001) and disease-specific (P < .0001) survival. In multivariate analysis, mode of presentation was an independent predictor of disease-free (P < 0.0001) and disease-specific survival (P < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic presentation correlates with an aggressive histology and advanced disease. Incidental tumors may be frequently detected in female and elderly patients, as these groups traditionally seek general medical care more regularly. Mode of presentation can independently predict an adverse patient outcome and should be included in RCC-specific modeling systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12474528     DOI: 10.1016/s1078-1439(01)00185-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  42 in total

1.  Paraneoplastic syndromes are associated with adverse prognosis among patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing nephrectomy.

Authors:  Daniel M Moreira; Boris Gershman; Christine M Lohse; Stephen A Boorjian; John C Cheville; Bradley C Leibovich; Robert Houston Thompson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Active surveillance for small renal masses.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Elias S Hyams; Jeffrey K Mullins; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2012

Review 3.  Review of renal cell carcinoma and its common subtypes in radiology.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Guan Huang; Winnie Fu; Zaahir Moloo; Safwat Girgis
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

Review 4.  Rare and changeable as a chameleon: paraneoplastic syndromes in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M Hegemann; N Kroeger; A Stenzl; J Bedke
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Alessandro Volpe; Jean Jacques Patard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Incidental IVC tumor thrombus found on echocardiographic work-up for systolic murmur leading to new diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Henri Gruwez; Maarten Falter; Korosh Sharain; Cyril Varghese; Roger Click
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2017-11-22

7.  Factors affecting the survival of patients treated by standard nephroureterectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  Suleyman Ataus; Bulent Onal; Burcin Tunc; Ahmet Erozenci; Arman Cekmen; Ali Riza Kural; Armagan Oner
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Influence of preoperative factors on the oncologic outcome for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Sophie Hurel; Morgan Rouprêt; Thomas Seisen; Eva Comperat; Véronique Phé; Stéphane Droupy; François Audenet; Géraldine Pignot; Xavier Cathelineau; Laurent Guy; Olivier Cussenot; Adil Ouzzane; Gregory Bozzini; Laurent Nison; Alain Ruffion; Pierre Colin
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Impact of preoperative radiological and postoperative pathological findings on survival of patients after radical nephrectomy performed with the indication of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Abdulmuttalip Şimşek; Onur Küçüktopcu; Fatih Akbulut; Faruk Özgör; Elif Küçüktopcu; Metin Savun; Yalçın Berberoğlu; Gökhan Gürbüz
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

10.  Renal cell carcinoma: Impact of mode of detection on its pathological characteristics.

Authors:  Paresh Jain; R Surdas; Pallavi Aga; Manoj Jain; Rakesh Kapoor; Aneesh Srivastava; Anil Mandhani
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.