Literature DB >> 12473996

Depression and somatization in patients with temporomandibular disorders.

Adrian U J Yap1, Keson B C Tan, Ee Kiam Chua, Hee Hon Tan.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Psychological and behavioral traits may be important for the diagnosis and management of orofacial pain.
PURPOSE: This study compared the levels of depression and somatization in patients in single and multiple research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD) diagnostic groups.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The RDC/TMD was established to allow standardization and replication of research into the most common forms of muscle- and joint-related research and is divided into 2 axes: axis I, clinical TMD, and axis II, pain-related disability and psychological status. One hundred seventeen patients (28 male and 89 female; mean age, 33.3 +/- 10.3 years) with RDC/TMD-defined clinical TMD were selected. The RDC/TMD history questionnaire and examination forms were input directly into computers with the use of a software program developed at the National University of Singapore (NUS TMDv1.1 software). Axis I and II variables were generated online and automatically archived for statistical analysis. Patients were subsequently classified into 7 groups based on the presence of the various RDC/TMD axis I diagnostic groups: group A, myofascial pain only (group I); group B, disk displacement only (group II); group C, other joint conditions such as arthralgia, osteoarthritis, and osteoarthrosis only (group III); group D, myofascial pain and disk displacement (groups I and II); group E, myofascial pain and other joint conditions (groups I and III); group F, disk displacement and other joint conditions (groups II and III); and group G, myofascial pain, disk displacement, and other joint conditions (groups I, II, and III). Differences in mean Symptom Checklist-90 scores between groups were compared by analysis of variance/Scheffé tests to contrast depression and somatization levels between the various axis I diagnostic groups (alpha=.05).
RESULTS: The frequencies of the different groups were as follows: group A, 26.5%; group B, 29.9%; group C, 12.8%; group D, 6.0%; group E, 13.7%; group F, 4.3%; and group G, 6.8%. Approximately 39% of patients were clinically depressed, and 55% had moderate to severe somatization. Differences in mean depression and somatization with pain item scores were significant between groups (P<.05).
CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, patients diagnosed with myofascial pain and other joint conditions (group E) had significantly higher levels of depression (P=.03) and somatization (P=.03) than patients diagnosed with only disk displacements (group B).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12473996     DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.129375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  35 in total

Review 1.  Temporomandibular disorders seen in rheumatology practices: A review.

Authors:  Saadet Sağlam Atsü; Figen Ayhan-Ardic
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Correlation of RDC/TMD axis I diagnoses and axis II pain-related disability. A multicenter study.

Authors:  Daniele Manfredini; Jari Ahlberg; Ephraim Winocur; Luca Guarda-Nardini; Frank Lobbezoo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Association of temporomandibular disorder with occupational visual display terminal use.

Authors:  Hideo Shigeishi
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2016-05-04

4.  Prevalence and associated factors for temporomandibular disorders in a group of Mexican adolescents and youth adults.

Authors:  Juan Fernando Casanova-Rosado; Carlo Eduardo Medina-Solís; Ana Alicia Vallejos-Sánchez; Alejandro José Casanova-Rosado; Bernardo Hernández-Prado; Leticia Avila-Burgos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Clinical and MRI investigation of temporomandibular joint in major depressed patients.

Authors:  S L P C Lopes; A L F Costa; A D Cruz; L M Li; S M de Almeida
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Insufficient diagnostic accuracy of a single-item questionnaire to detect psychosocial distress in temporomandibular disorder patients.

Authors:  Daniel R Reissmann; Mike T John; Levente Kriston; Oliver Schierz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Temporal summation of pain characterizes women but not men with temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Eleni Sarlani; Pauline H Garrett; Edward G Grace; Joel D Greenspan
Journal:  J Orofac Pain       Date:  2007

8.  TMD pain: the effect on health related quality of life and the influence of pain duration.

Authors:  Geerten-Has E Tjakkes; Jan-Jaap Reinders; Elisabeth M Tenvergert; Boudewijn Stegenga
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Are post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and temporomandibular pain associated? Findings from a community-based twin registry.

Authors:  Niloofar Afari; Yang Wen; Dedra Buchwald; Jack Goldberg; Octavia Plesh
Journal:  J Orofac Pain       Date:  2008

10.  Comparison of perceived oral health in patients with temporomandibular disorders and dental anxiety using oral health-related quality of life profiles.

Authors:  Oliver Schierz; Mike T John; Daniel R Reissmann; Mats Mehrstedt; András Szentpétery
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.