Literature DB >> 12473821

Clinical characteristics of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in a general outpatient department of obstetrics and gynaecology in the Netherlands.

C J Bax1, P M Oostvogel, J A E M Mutsaers, R Brand, M Craandijk, J B Trimbos, P J Dörr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of prevalence and risk factors of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in an outpatient obstetric and gynaecological population.
METHODS: A prospective, observational study was performed at an inner city hospital in The Hague, Netherlands. 1368 women attending the outpatient department of obstetrics and gynaecology participated in the study. For detection of C trachomatis infections we used amplification of CT rRNA in urine samples (Gen Probe/AMPLIFIED-CT) and DNA probe for detection of CT rRNA from a urethral, endocervical and anal swab (Gen Probe/PACE 2).
RESULTS: The overall prevalence of C trachomatis infections in our general obstetric and gynaecological population was 4.5%. The prevalence in women under 30 years of age was 8. 1%. We found age and postcoital bleeding to be significant risk factors. We did not find significant differences between women from different ethnic origin or between women using different kinds of contraceptives. 12 (19.4%) patients with C trachomatis infections were found positive by urine test only, and 15 (24.2%) only by DNA probe.
CONCLUSIONS: Age is the most important risk factor in our population (overall prevalence 4.5%, prevalence in women under 20 years of age 15.8%). Analyses of urine and of endocervical specimens are complementary for the determination of the prevalence of C trachomatis infections in women. Cost effectiveness analysis is needed to determine to what extent age based screening and/or antibiotic prophylaxis before intrauterine manipulations is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12473821      PMCID: PMC1758350          DOI: 10.1136/sti.78.6.e6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  10 in total

Review 1.  Genital chlamydial infections: epidemiology and reproductive sequelae.

Authors:  W Cates; J N Wasserheit
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Evaluation of the microparticle enzyme immunoassay Abbott IMx Select Chlamydia and the importance of urethral site sampling to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in women.

Authors:  M K Brokenshire; P J Say; A H van Vonno; C Wong
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-12

3.  Criteria for selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending family planning clinics.

Authors:  H H Handsfield; L L Jasman; P L Roberts; V W Hanson; R L Kothenbeutel; W E Stamm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The vaginal introitus: a novel site for Chlamydia trachomatis testing in women.

Authors:  H C Wiesenfeld; R P Heine; A Rideout; I Macio; F DiBiasi; R L Sweet
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population of Amsterdam. Il Over 90% participation and almost 5% prevalence].

Authors:  J A van den Hoek; D K Mulder-Folkerts; R A Coutinho; N H Dukers; M Buimer; G J van Doornum
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  1999-03-27

6.  Criteria for selective screening of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending private gynecology practices.

Authors:  J Warszawski; L Meyer; P Weber
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Which women should be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis?

Authors:  S Macmillan; H McKenzie; G Flett; A Templeton
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a primary care population of women.

Authors:  A Stergachis; D Scholes; F E Heidrich; D M Sherer; K K Holmes; W E Stamm
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  A randomised comparison of strategies for reducing infective complications of induced abortion.

Authors:  G C Penney; M Thomson; J Norman; H McKenzie; L Vale; R Smith; M Imrie
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-06

10.  Prospective study of perinatal transmission of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J Schachter; M Grossman; R L Sweet; J Holt; C Jordan; E Bishop
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-06-27       Impact factor: 56.272

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Abnormal cervical appearance: what to do, when to worry?

Authors:  Petra M Casey; Margaret E Long; Mary L Marnach
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Use of pooled urine samples and automated DNA isolation to achieve improved sensitivity and cost-effectiveness of large-scale testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women.

Authors:  G I J G Rours; R P Verkooyen; H F M Willemse; E A E van der Zwaan; A van Belkum; R de Groot; H A Verbrugh; J M Ossewaarde
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  A systematic review of postcoital bleeding and risk of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Mark Shapley; Joanne Jordan; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Measuring the nature and duration of symptoms of cervical cancer in young women: developing an interview-based approach.

Authors:  Anita W W Lim; Lindsay J L Forbes; Adam N Rosenthal; Kantipati S Raju; Amanda-Jane Ramirez
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.809

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.