Literature DB >> 12473601

Genomic loss of 18p predicts an adverse clinical outcome in patients with high-risk breast cancer.

Joan Climent1, Jose A Martinez-Climent, David Blesa, Maria J Garcia-Barchino, Rosana Saez, Dolors Sánchez-Izquierdo, Pilar Azagra, Ana Lluch, Javier Garcia-Conde.   

Abstract

The impact of the genomic imbalances on the clinical outcome of 34 patients with lymph-node positive high-risk breast cancer (HRBC) was investigated using comparative genomic hybridization. All of the patients were uniformly treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. The average number of chromosomal imbalances per tumor was 11 (range, 2-24), including DNA overrepresentation on chromosomes 1q (59%), 17q (38%), 8q and 16p (35% each), 20q (32%), and 19p (26%), and genomic losses involving 9p and 18q (41%), 8p, 11q, and 18p (38%), 17p (32%), 4p and Xq (29%), and 16q (26%). The most significant association among genomic changes and clinical-pathological features was the correlation of the loss of 8p with progesterone receptor positivity (P < 0.005). With a median follow-up time of 74 months, 15 patients (44%) have relapsed. In the univariate analysis, patients with gain/amplification of 17q including the HER-2/neu gene locus had a longer disease-free survival (P = 0.02), whereas those with genomic loss of 18p had a higher probability of relapse (P = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, the loss of 18p was the only parameter correlated with shorter disease-free survival (relative risk, 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-14.8; P = 0.006). In summary, our data indicate that the tumoral genomic profile may represent a valuable marker for predicting the clinical outcome in HRBC. Furthermore, the genomic loss of 18p may identify a poor prognostic subgroup of patients with HRBC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12473601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  13 in total

1.  A potent modifier of liver cancer risk on distal mouse chromosome 1: linkage analysis and characterization of congenic lines.

Authors:  Andrea Bilger; L Michelle Bennett; Reynaldo A Carabeo; Teresa A Chiaverotti; Cecily Dvorak; Kristin M Liss; Susan A Schadewald; Henry C Pitot; Norman R Drinkwater
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Pharmacotherapeutic Management of Breast Cancer in Elderly Patients: The Promise of Novel Agents.

Authors:  Catherine Terret; Chiara Russo
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Loss, mutation and deregulation of L3MBTL4 in breast cancers.

Authors:  Lynda Addou-Klouche; José Adélaïde; Pascal Finetti; Nathalie Cervera; Anthony Ferrari; Ismahane Bekhouche; Fabrice Sircoulomb; Christos Sotiriou; Patrice Viens; Soraya Moulessehoul; François Bertucci; Daniel Birnbaum; Max Chaffanet
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 27.401

4.  Aberrations of TACC1 and TACC3 are associated with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Brenda Lauffart; Mary M Vaughan; Roger Eddy; David Chervinsky; Richard A DiCioccio; Jennifer D Black; Ivan H Still
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Allelic imbalances of chromosomes 8p and 18q and their roles in distant relapse of early stage, node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Aki Morikawa; Tanisha Y Williams; Luc Dirix; Cecile Colpaert; Michael Goodman; Robert H Lyles; Diansheng Zhong; Wei Zhou
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 6.  Array-CGH and breast cancer.

Authors:  Erik H van Beers; Petra M Nederlof
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Genomic aberrations in young and elderly  breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hatem A Azim; Bastien Nguyen; Sylvain Brohée; Gabriele Zoppoli; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  The DNMT1/PCNA/UHRF1 disruption induces tumorigenesis characterized by similar genetic and epigenetic signatures.

Authors:  Romain Pacaud; Emeline Brocard; Lisenn Lalier; Eric Hervouet; François M Vallette; Pierre-François Cartron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Gene expression profiling of the 8q22-24 position in human breast cancer: TSPYL5, MTDH, ATAD2 and CCNE2 genes are implicated in oncogenesis, while WISP1 and EXT1 genes may predict a risk of metastasis.

Authors:  Afsoon Taghavi; Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari; Mohammad Hashemi-Bahremani; Nahid Nafissi; Ahad Khalilnezhad; Seyed Mohammad Poorhosseini; Feyzollah Hashemi-Gorji; Vahid Reza Yassaee
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Identification of Copy Number Aberrations in Breast Cancer Subtypes Using Persistence Topology.

Authors:  Javier Arsuaga; Tyler Borrman; Raymond Cavalcante; Georgina Gonzalez; Catherine Park
Journal:  Microarrays (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.