PURPOSE: The presence of an active lymphocytic response (ALR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors has previously been associated with a more favorable prognosis. The purpose of this study was to identify differences in global gene expression profiles between stage I NSCLC tumors with ALR (ALR+) and those without ALR (ALR-). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Sixty-three stage I lung adenocarcinomas were analyzed for gene expression using Affymetrix oligonucleotide microarrays. Tumors were stratified into ALR+ and ALR- groups and compared for statistically significant differences in gene expression. Identified candidate genes were validated using both ELISA and immunohistochemistry. Follow-up data for these patients were collected and used to assess patient prognosis. RESULTS: Of the 63 tumors studied, 27 were ALR+ and 36 were ALR-. A total of 303 genes showed significant differences in gene expression between the two populations (t test, P < 0.02). Three of the genes overexpressed by ALR+ tumors were the chemokines: small inducible cytokine A4 (MIP-1beta), RANTES, and interferon inducible protein 10 (IP-10). Immunohistochemistry analysis showed that the tumor cells expressed these cytokines. ELISA showed that MIP-1beta and RANTES were overexpressed at the protein level by ALR+ tumors. Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that RANTES was a predictor of survival in stage I lung adenocarcinomas (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: When tested in the Cox univariate proportional hazards model, RANTES expression by lung adenocarcinoma cells is a predictor of survival in stage I NSCLC patients and may be useful as a prognostic factor in lung cancer.
PURPOSE: The presence of an active lymphocytic response (ALR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors has previously been associated with a more favorable prognosis. The purpose of this study was to identify differences in global gene expression profiles between stage I NSCLC tumors with ALR (ALR+) and those without ALR (ALR-). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Sixty-three stage I lung adenocarcinomas were analyzed for gene expression using Affymetrix oligonucleotide microarrays. Tumors were stratified into ALR+ and ALR- groups and compared for statistically significant differences in gene expression. Identified candidate genes were validated using both ELISA and immunohistochemistry. Follow-up data for these patients were collected and used to assess patient prognosis. RESULTS: Of the 63 tumors studied, 27 were ALR+ and 36 were ALR-. A total of 303 genes showed significant differences in gene expression between the two populations (t test, P < 0.02). Three of the genes overexpressed by ALR+tumors were the chemokines: small inducible cytokine A4 (MIP-1beta), RANTES, and interferon inducible protein 10 (IP-10). Immunohistochemistry analysis showed that the tumor cells expressed these cytokines. ELISA showed that MIP-1beta and RANTES were overexpressed at the protein level by ALR+tumors. Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that RANTES was a predictor of survival in stage I lung adenocarcinomas (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: When tested in the Cox univariate proportional hazards model, RANTES expression by lung adenocarcinoma cells is a predictor of survival in stage I NSCLCpatients and may be useful as a prognostic factor in lung cancer.
Authors: Alain C Borczuk; Han K Kim; Hilary A Yegen; Richard A Friedman; Charles A Powell Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-06-23 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jens Neumann; Friedrich Feuerhake; Gian Kayser; Thorsten Wiech; Konrad Aumann; Bernward Passlick; Paul Fisch; Martin Werner; Axel Zur Hausen Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-03-02 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Zinal S Chheda; Rajesh K Sharma; Venkatakrishna R Jala; Andrew D Luster; Bodduluri Haribabu Journal: J Immunol Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Michael P Gruber; Christopher D Coldren; Malcolm D Woolum; Gregory P Cosgrove; Chan Zeng; Anna E Barón; Mark D Moore; Carlyne D Cool; G Scott Worthen; Kevin K Brown; Mark W Geraci Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2006-02-23 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: A C Borczuk; N Papanikolaou; R L Toonkel; M Sole; L A Gorenstein; M E Ginsburg; J R Sonett; R A Friedman; C A Powell Journal: Oncogene Date: 2007-07-23 Impact factor: 9.867