Literature DB >> 12473441

Evaluation of satisfaction with midwifery care.

Sheila Harvey1, Diane Rach, M Colleen Stainton, John Jarrell, Rollin Brant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to determine if there were differences in women's satisfaction with maternity care given by doctors and midwives. In addition a simple, six-question, satisfaction questionnaire was to be tested.
DESIGN: a randomised controlled trial comparing two models of maternity care.
SETTING: a tertiary referral centre in Alberta, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: one hundred and ninety four women with a low-risk pregnancy were randomly assigned to either the midwife care, experimental group (n = 101), or the doctor care, control group (n = 93).
INTERVENTIONS: a pilot midwifery programme was introduced into a maternity services delivery system that did not have established midwifery. MEASUREMENTS: women's satisfaction was measured, at two weeks postpartum, with the Labour and Delivery Satisfaction Index (LADSI), general attitudes toward the birth experience, also at two weeks postpartum; with the Attitudes about Labour and Delivery Experience (ADLE) questionnaire. Fluctuations in satisfaction were measured with a Six Simple Questions (SSQ) questionnaire at 36 weeks gestation and 48 hours, two and six weeks postpartum.
FINDINGS: women in the midwife group reported significantly greater satisfaction and a more positive attitude toward their childbirth experience than women in the doctor group (p < 0.001). The SSQ demonstrated scores similar to the LADSI. Satisfaction in both groups was lowest at 36 weeks gestation and highest immediately postpartum. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: women experiencing low-risk pregnancies were more satisfied with care by midwives than with care provided by doctors. Satisfaction scores were high for both groups and may have been lower for women in the doctor group as a result of disappointment with caregiver assignment as all women had sought midwifery care. The SSQ measures similar dimensions to the LADSI but the agreement is not strong enough to recommend its use as a substitute at this time. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: the significantly higher satisfaction of the women with the care provided by the midwives together with better clinical outcomes reported elsewhere suggest that the option of midwifery care should be accessible as an option for all women in Canada. Further research is suggested to determine the usefulness of the SSQ. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12473441     DOI: 10.1054/midw.2002.0317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  22 in total

1.  Mix of Maternity Care Providers in Canada.

Authors:  Harminder Guliani
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-08

2.  Rooming-In: Creating a Better Experience.

Authors:  Lois O Theo; Emily Drake
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2017

3.  Postnatal care: development of a psychometric multidimensional satisfaction questionnaire (the WOMBPNSQ) to assess women's views.

Authors:  Lindsay F P Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review.

Authors:  Alexandra Sawyer; Susan Ayers; Jane Abbott; Gillian Gyte; Heike Rabe; Lelia Duley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Delivery care satisfaction at government hospitals in xiengkhuang province under the maternal and child health strategy in lao pdr.

Authors:  Phommachanh Khammany; Yoshitoku Yoshida; Mohammad Abul Bashar Sarker; Chanthalangsy Touy; Joshua A Reyer; Nobuyuki Hamajima
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.131

6.  Client satisfaction of maternity care in Lorestan province Iran.

Authors:  Farahnaz Changee; Alireza Irajpour; Masoumeh Simbar; Soheila Akbari
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 May-Jun

7.  Antenatal telephone support intervention with and without uterine artery Doppler screening for low risk nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Vikki J Snaith; Jenny Hewison; Ian N Steen; Stephen C Robson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.

Authors:  Jane Sandall; Hora Soltani; Simon Gates; Andrew Shennan; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-28

9.  Satisfaction with maternity care among recent migrants: an interview questionnaire-based study.

Authors:  Sukhjeet Bains; Johanne Sundby; Benedikte V Lindskog; Siri Vangen; Lien M Diep; Katrine M Owe; Ingvil K Sorbye
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Parents' experiences and satisfaction with care during the birth of their very preterm baby: a qualitative study.

Authors:  A Sawyer; H Rabe; J Abbott; G Gyte; L Duley; S Ayers
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 6.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.