Literature DB >> 12472817

Violence risk assessment: combining actuarial and clinical information to structure clinical judgements for the formulation and management of risk.

M Doyle1, M Dolan.   

Abstract

Throughout history most societies have assumed a link between mental disorder and violence to others. In recent times there has been increasing concern in the United Kingdom over law and order, specifically the risk of violence, and these issues are now high on the political and mental health agenda. Nurses and staff working in National Health Service Mental Health Service Trusts are the groups most at risk of violence. Many clinical decisions are based on risk. Mental health nurses play a pivotal role in the assessment and management of risk and it is argued that they need to adopt a clear structured approach to violence risk assessment and management, which is evidence-based. The advantages of clinical and actuarial approaches to risk assessment are briefly reviewed and a structured clinical judgement approach is proposed that combines these approaches. A method of linking the assessment process with the management plan via a risk formulation is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12472817     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2850.2002.00535.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1351-0126            Impact factor:   2.952


  8 in total

Review 1.  An Etiological Approach to Sexual Offender Assessment: CAse Formulation Incorporating Risk Assessment (CAFIRA).

Authors:  Leam A Craig; Martin Rettenberger
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Measurement of Change in Dynamic Factors Using the START:AV.

Authors:  Brian G Sellers; Sarah L Desmarais; Matthew W Hanger
Journal:  J Forensic Psychol Res Pract       Date:  2017-06-05

3.  Criminally violent victimisation in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: the relationship to symptoms and substance abuse.

Authors:  Mairead C Dolan; David Castle; Kate McGregor
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Predicting inpatient violence using an extended version of the Brøset-Violence-Checklist: instrument development and clinical application.

Authors:  Christoph Abderhalden; Ian Needham; Theo Dassen; Ruud Halfens; Hans-Joachim Haug; Joachim Fischer
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Risk assessment by client and case manager for shared decision making in outpatient forensic psychiatry.

Authors:  Rob H S van den Brink; Nadine A C Troquete; Harry Beintema; Tamara Mulder; Titus W D P van Os; Robert A Schoevers; Durk Wiersma
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Mental health professionals' perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Nafiso Ahmed; Sally Barlow; Lisa Reynolds; Nicholas Drey; Fareha Begum; Elizabeth Tuudah; Alan Simpson
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Susceptibility (risk and protective) factors for in-patient violence and self-harm: prospective study of structured professional judgement instruments START and SAPROF, DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 in forensic mental health services.

Authors:  Zareena Abidin; Mary Davoren; Leena Naughton; Olivia Gibbons; Andrea Nulty; Harry G Kennedy
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Structured Professional Judgment to Assist the Evaluation and Safety Planning of Suicide Risk: The Risk of Suicide Protocol (RoSP).

Authors:  Nicola S Gray; Ann John; Aimee McKinnon; Stephanie Raybould; James Knowles; Robert J Snowden
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.157

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.