Literature DB >> 12472475

Evolution and critical appraisal of anastomotic technique following resection of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

A G Casson1, G A Porter, P J Veugelers.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to critically evaluate acute and long-term complications of hand-sewn and semimechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis following resection of primary esophageal adenocarcinoma. Between February 1991 and 2001, 91 consecutive patients underwent subtotal esophagectomy (transthoracic, n=49; transhiatal, n=42), transposing a gastric tube based on the right gastroepiploic artery. All esophagogastric anastomoses were performed in the left neck using a hand-sewn technique (n=53) and, from September 1997, a side-to-side semimechanical technique (n=38). Outcomes evaluated were anastomotic leak rates, length of stay, and development of strictures. Postoperative mortality was 4.4% (all cardiopulmonary causes). Fifty-eight patients (63.7%) had an uncomplicated postoperative course, with a median postoperative length of stay of 10 days (vs. 20 days with associated morbidity; P </= 0.001). Anastomotic leaks were the leading cause of postoperative morbidity (16.5%, 15/91), and were classified into four types based on severity. The semimechanical anastomotic technique was associated with a reduced leak rate compared with the hand-sewn technique (7.9%, 3/38 vs. 22.6%, 12/53; P=0.08), although different patterns of anastomotic failure were seen following semimechanical anastomoses, with increased mediastinal and pleural sepsis. Anastomotic strictures developed in nine (17.0%) hand-sewn and three (7.9%) semimechanical anastomoses. Our conclusion was that a semimechanical technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy is associated with reduced anastomotic leak rates compared with hand-sewn anastomoses, resulting in a shorter postoperative stay. Patterns of anastomotic failure varied between each technique, possibly as a consequence of a longer cervical esophageal segment required for construction of a semimechanical anastomosis. The association between anastomotic technique and stricture development was not clear from this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12472475     DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2002.00277.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  10 in total

1.  Extending the reach of stapled anastomosis with a prepared OrVil™ device in laparoscopic oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Abdelmonim E A Salih; Gary A Bass; Yvonne D'Cruz; Robert P Brennan; Sebastian Smolarek; Mayilone Arumugasamy; Thomas N Walsh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Fady Yanni; Pritam Singh; Nilanjana Tewari; Simon L Parsons; James A Catton; John Duffy; Neil T Welch; Ravinder S Vohra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Isoperistaltic left colic graft interposition via a retrosternal approach for esophageal reconstruction in patients with a caustic stricture: mortality, morbidity, and functional results.

Authors:  Abdelkader Boukerrouche
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu-Feng Deng; Quan-Xing Liu; Dong Zhou; Jia-Xin Min; Ji-Gang Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study.

Authors:  Qi-Rong Xu; Kang-Ning Wang; Wen-Ping Wang; Kun Zhang; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Author's Reply: Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Fady Yanni
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Utilization of the delay phenomenon improves blood flow and reduces collagen deposition in esophagogastric anastomoses.

Authors:  Kevin M Reavis; Eugene Y Chang; John G Hunter; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy: lessons learned.

Authors:  Grant Sanders; Frederic Borie; Emanuel Husson; Pierre Marie Blanc; Gianluca Di Mauro; Christiano Claus; Bertrand Millat
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  [Management of delayed complications after esophagectomy].

Authors:  A Beham; S Dango; B M Ghadimi
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 10.  Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  S K Kamarajah; J R Bundred; P Singh; S Pasquali; E A Griffiths
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-05-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.