Literature DB >> 12472326

Effect of a clinical practice improvement intervention on Chlamydial screening among adolescent girls.

Mary-Ann B Shafer1, Kathleen P Tebb, Robert H Pantell, Charles J Wibbelsman, John M Neuhaus, Ann C Tipton, Sharon Brown Kunin, Timothy H Ko, David M Schweppe, David A Bergman.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Chlamydia trachomatis infection is a serious public health concern that disproportionately affects adolescent girls. Although annual C trachomatis screening of sexually active adolescent girls is recommended by health professional organizations and is a Health Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) performance measure, this goal is not being met.
OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a system-level, clinical practice improvement intervention designed to increase C trachomatis screening by using urine-based tests for sexually active adolescent girls identified during their routine checkups at a pediatric clinic. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized cluster of 10 pediatric clinics in the Kaiser Permanente of Northern California health maintenance organization, where adolescent girls aged 14 to 18 years had a total of 7920 routine checkup visits from April 2000 through March 2002. INTERVENTION: Five clinics were randomly assigned to provide usual care and 5 to provide the intervention, which required that leadership be engaged by showing the gap between best practice and current practice; a team be assembled to champion the project; barriers be identified and solutions developed through monthly meetings; and progress be monitored with site-specific screening proportions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Chlamydia trachomatis screening rate for sexually active 14- to 18-year-old girls during routine checkups at each participating clinic.
RESULTS: The population of adolescents was ethnically diverse with an average age of 15.4 years. Twenty-four percent of girls in the experimental clinics and 23% in the control clinics were sexually active. Of the 1017 patients eligible for screening in the intervention clinic, 478 (47%) were screened; of 1194 eligible for screening in the control clinic, 203 (17%) were screened. At baseline, the proportion screened was 0.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00-0.17) in the intervention and 0.14 (95% CI, 0.01-0.26) in the control clinics. By months 16 to 18, screening rates were 0.65 (95% CI, 0.53-0.77) in the intervention and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.09-0.33) in the control clinics (time period by study group interaction, F(6,60) = 5.33; P<.001). The average infection rate for the experimental clinics was 5.8% (23 positive test results out of 393 total urine tests and a total of 3986 clinic visits) vs 7.6% in controls (12 positive test results out of 157 tests and 3934 clinic visits).
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of this clinical practice intervention in a large health maintenance organization system is feasible, and it significantly increased the C trachomatis screening rates for sexually active adolescent girls during routine checkups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12472326     DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  34 in total

1.  Insurance and noninvasive screening for STDs.

Authors:  Mary B Adam
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Comparison of adherence to chlamydia screening guidelines among Title X providers and non-Title X providers in the California Family Planning, Access, Care, and Treatment Program.

Authors:  Joan M Chow; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Denis Hulett; Hye-Youn Park; Philip Darney
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Elena Parmelli; Gaby Doumit; Melina Gattellari; Mary Ann O'Brien; Jeremy Grimshaw; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-08-10

Review 4.  Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives.

Authors:  Richard P T M Grol; Marije C Bosch; Marlies E J L Hulscher; Martin P Eccles; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Sexual history-taking among primary care physicians.

Authors:  Yolanda H Wimberly; Matthew Hogben; Jada Moore-Ruffin; Sandra E Moore; Yvonne Fry-Johnson
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Review of Clinical Trials Testing the Effectiveness of Clinician Intervention Approaches to Prevent Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Adolescent Outpatients.

Authors:  Bradley O Boekeloo; Melinda A Griffin
Journal:  Curr Pediatr Rev       Date:  2005-06

7.  Screening for nonviral sexually transmitted infections in adolescents and young adults.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  Comparative health systems research among Kaiser Permanente and other integrated delivery systems: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Jared Lane K Maeda; Karen M Lee; Michael Horberg
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2014-06-09

Review 9.  Screening for genital chlamydia infection.

Authors:  Nicola Low; Shelagh Redmond; Anneli Uusküla; Jan van Bergen; Helen Ward; Berit Andersen; Hannelore Götz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-13

10.  Promoting chlamydia screening with posters and leaflets in general practice--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Elaine Freeman; Rebecca Howell-Jones; Isabel Oliver; Sarah Randall; William Ford-Young; Philippa Beckwith; Cliodna McNulty
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.