Literature DB >> 12472230

High-pressure pulsatile lavage irrigation of contaminated fractures: effects on fracture healing.

Peter A Caprise1, Theodore Miclau, Laurence E Dahners, Douglas R Dirschl.   

Abstract

To evaluate the effects of high-pressure pulsatile lavage (HPPL) irrigation on new bone formation and fracture union in a contaminated intraarticular fracture, 45 New Zealand white rabbits were divided into three equal groups. The control group (C) underwent an osteotomy of the medial femoral condyle, contamination with a slurry of clay mixed with Staphylococcus aureus, stabilization and closure. The bulb syringe and pulsatile groups (B and P) underwent an identical procedure, with the addition of irrigation with 11 of saline by bulb syringe or pulsatile lavage system. Two fluorescent bone stains that mark new bone formation were administered subcutaneously: xylenol orange at the time of surgery and calcein green one week postoperatively. Animals were euthanized two weeks postoperatively and femurs were retrieved for histological analysis. Union was determined by examination of microradiographs. The viability of bone along the osteotomy site in the first and second weeks after irrigation was determined by evaluation of the two fluorescent stains. The density of new bone two weeks after irrigation was assessed by digitization of the microradiographs. Nonunion was present in 77%, 53%, and 43% of animals in groups C, B, and P, respectively. There was an increase in the presence of bands of both fluorescent stains along the osteotomy site in the groups B and P compared to group C. There was no statistically significant difference between groups B and P in either fluorescent stain. On digitization of microradiographs, there was more calcified new bone on postoperative day 14 in group P than in either group B or C (p = 0.04). The addition of contamination and foreign material to an intraarticular fracture model results in lower rates of new bone formation and fracture union. Irrigation in this setting is clearly beneficial, whether the irrigant is delivered by bulb irrigation or by HPPL. The results of this study indicate using HPPL in this setting does not cause greater damage than using bulb syringe irrigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12472230     DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00049-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  4 in total

1.  Fluid lavage of open wounds (FLOW): design and rationale for a large, multicenter collaborative 2 x 3 factorial trial of irrigating pressures and solutions in patients with open fractures.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Comparing the speed of irrigation between pulsatile lavage versus gravity irrigation: an Ex-vivo experimental investigation.

Authors:  Lily R Mundy; Mark J Gage; Richard S Yoon; Frank A Liporace
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2017-03-27

Review 3.  A systematic review on current osteosynthesis-associated infection animal fracture models.

Authors:  Ronald M Y Wong; Tsz-Kiu Li; Jie Li; Wing-Tung Ho; Simon K-H Chow; Sharon S Y Leung; Wing-Hoi Cheung; Margaret Ip
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Fluid lavage in patients with open fracture wounds (FLOW): an international survey of 984 surgeons.

Authors:  Brad Petrisor; Kyle Jeray; Emil Schemitsch; Beate Hanson; Sheila Sprague; David Sanders; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.