Literature DB >> 12471615

Quantitative analysis of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor in ovarian epithelial tumors: a novel approach to explain the field effect of ovarian cancer development in secondary mullerian systems.

Jun Wang1, Lynne Lin, Vinita Parkash, Peter E Schwartz, Stuart C Lauchlan, Wenxin Zheng.   

Abstract

The role of FSHR expression in ovarian cancer development is not clear. We examined quantitative expression of FSHR in different types of OET, presumed precursor lesions and peritoneal implants and further discussed FSH as a key growth-promotion factor for the process of ovarian epithelial tumorigenesis. Thirty-five primary OET specimens, including 5 serous cystadenomas, 4 papillary serous cystadenomas, 9 SBTs and 17 serous carcinomas, were examined for quantitative FSHR expression. Ten paired samples (3 benign cystadenomas, 5 SBTs and 2 carcinomas) were obtained from several morphologically different areas, including benign-looking, borderline and cancerous areas in the same OETs, and from the remaining ovarian tissue and contralateral ovaries. Competitive RT-PCR was performed to measure the quantitative expression of FSHR in each tissue sample. FSHR expression levels were compared among nonpaired samples and within paired samples. We found that OSE had the lowest FSHR expression, whereas antral follicles had the highest level. Within benign OETs, papillary serous cystadenomas have 4.9-fold higher FSHR levels than nonpapillary serous cystadenomas. SBTs had the highest level of FSHR expression, which was 12.8-fold, 2.7-fold and 2.4-fold higher than that of serous cystadenomas, papillary serous cystadenomas and grade 1 carcinomas, respectively. A similarly high level of FSHR mRNA was found in peritoneal implants, which were associated with SBTs. FSHR levels among serous carcinomas decreased with an increase in carcinoma grade. Grade 3 carcinomas had the lowest FSHR level, which was similar to that of serous cystadenomas, while grade 1 carcinomas had 6.5-fold higher FSHR levels than those in serous cystadenomas. Our results suggest that not only serum FSH but also FSHR in ovarian epithelium may play important roles in ovarian OET development. Both the receptor and ligand may act in a synergistic way to promote tumor growth. The observation that high FSHR levels are present in peritoneal implants suggests that FSH may also play a similar role in the development of peritoneal serous tumors. From this perspective, circulating FSH may be considered a driving force in the field effect theory for the development of both ovarian neoplasms and their associated peritoneal implants. However, the exact role of FSH and/or FSHR in the development of epithelial tumors arising in both the ovary and peritoneum needs further investigation. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12471615     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.10848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  16 in total

1.  Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Is Expressed by Most Ovarian Cancer Subtypes and Is a Safe and Effective Immunotherapeutic Target.

Authors:  Alfredo Perales-Puchalt; Nikolaos Svoronos; Melanie R Rutkowski; Michael J Allegrezza; Amelia J Tesone; Kyle K Payne; Jayamanna Wickramasinghe; Jenny M Nguyen; Shane W O'Brien; Kiranmai Gumireddy; Qihong Huang; Mark G Cadungog; Denise C Connolly; Julia Tchou; Tyler J Curiel; Jose R Conejo-Garcia
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Trans-activation, cis-activation and signal selection of gonadotropin receptors.

Authors:  MyoungKun Jeoung; ChangWoo Lee; Inhae Ji; Tae H Ji
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 4.102

3.  Giant serous cystadenoma arising from an accessory ovary in a morbidly obese 11-year-old girl: a case report.

Authors:  Steven M Sharatz; Taína A Treviño; Luís Rodriguez; Jared H West
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2008-01-18

Review 4.  Allosteric modulators of glycoprotein hormone receptors: discovery and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Brian J Arey
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Differential action of glycoprotein hormones: significance in cancer progression.

Authors:  Vijayakumar Govindaraj; Swathy V Arya; A J Rao
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.869

6.  The Asn680Ser polymorphism of the follicle stimulating hormone receptor gene and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xue Qin; Liping Ma; Shi Yang; Jianyang Zhao; Siyuan Chen; Yantong Xie; Jian Wang; Taijie Li; Yu He; Qiliu Peng; Yan Deng; Shan Li; Aiping Qin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Urothelial carcinoma: stem cells on the edge.

Authors:  William D Brandt; William Matsui; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Xiaobing He; Shizhang Ling; Edward M Schaeffer; David M Berman
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 9.264

8.  Hereditary ovarian cancer and two-compartment tumor metabolism: epithelial loss of BRCA1 induces hydrogen peroxide production, driving oxidative stress and NFκB activation in the tumor stroma.

Authors:  Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Renee M Balliet; Zhao Lin; Diana Whitaker-Menezes; Anthony Howell; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Effects of antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to follicle-stimulating hormone receptor on the cell proliferation and apoptosis in cells derived from human ovarian mucinous cystadenocarcinoma in Vitro.

Authors:  Shuang Li; Ding Ma; Changhong Zhu
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2007-02

10.  Gankyrin facilitates follicle-stimulating hormone-driven ovarian cancer cell proliferation through the PI3K/AKT/HIF-1α/cyclin D1 pathway.

Authors:  J Chen; M Bai; C Ning; B Xie; J Zhang; H Liao; J Xiong; X Tao; D Yan; X Xi; X Chen; Y Yu; R C Bast; Z Zhang; Y Feng; W Zheng
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.