Literature DB >> 12471536

A comparison of three types of biopsy forceps in the endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus.

S Dolwani1, H Saleem, I W Thompson, M C Allison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Periodic endoscopic biopsy surveillance is recommended for selected patients with Barrett's oesophagus. A new angled swing-jaw forceps has become available which is said to facilitate tangential oesophageal biopsy sampling. We examined the size and quality of oesophageal biopsies obtained with the forceps of angled design in comparison with the large cup disposable forceps and the conventional reusable upper gastrointestinal forceps. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective comparative study, three biopsies were taken at each of three levels, using a different design of forceps at each level, in each of 48 patients undergoing endoscopic surveillance. The order in which the forceps were used was randomized. A pathologist assessed the size and quality of each set of biopsies obtained.
RESULTS: The mean biopsy diameter was significantly greater at 3.00 mm with the angled forceps (P < 0.01), in comparison with 2.52 mm with the elliptical forceps and 2.07 mm with the conventional forceps. Fewer biopsies obtained with the angled forceps were graded as inadequate (8.3 %) compared with those obtained using the disposable large cup and conventional forceps (25 % and 22.9 %, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The design of forceps used influences the size and quality of tissue obtained during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus. The angled swing-jaw forceps are recommended as the most suitable for this purpose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12471536     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-35848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  2 in total

1.  Randomized comparison of 3 different-sized biopsy forceps for quality of sampling in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Susana Gonzalez; Woojin M Yu; Michael S Smith; Kristen N Slack; Heidrun Rotterdam; Julian A Abrams; Charles J Lightdale
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Barrett's esophagus: where do we stand?

Authors:  Majid A Al Madi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.485

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.