Literature DB >> 12470996

Perforated peptic ulcer: open versus laparoscopic repair.

W Y Lau1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 12470996     DOI： 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60190-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN： 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Raimundas Lunevicius; Matas Morkevicius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Management of perforated peptic ulcer in a district general hospital.

Authors:  A C Critchley; A W Phillips; S M Bawa; P V Gallagher
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Conversion of laparoscopic surgery for perforated peptic ulcer: a single-center study.

Authors:  Markus Zimmermann; Martin Hoffmann; Tilman Laubert; Carlo Jung; Hans-Peter Bruch; Erik Schloericke
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Lau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic closure of perforated gastro-duodenal ulcer: 15 years' experience in our centre.

Authors:  Michal Žáček; Juraj Váňa; Boris Babiš
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 6.  Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature.

Authors:  Mariëtta J O E Bertleff; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.