Literature DB >> 12468991

Mechanisms and state of the art of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Mark S George1, Ziad Nahas, F Andrew Kozel, Xingbao Li, Stewart Denslow, Kaori Yamanaka, Alexander Mishory, Milton J Foust, Daryl E Bohning.   

Abstract

In 1985, Barker et al. built a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) device with enough power to stimulate dorsal roots in the spine. They quickly realized that this machine could likely also noninvasively stimulate the superficial cortex in humans. They waited a while before using their device over a human head, fearing that the TMS pulse might magnetically "erase the hard-drive" of the human brain. Almost 10 years later, in 1994, an editorial in this journal concerned whether TMS might evolve into a potential antidepressant treatment. In the intervening years, there has been an explosion of basic and clinical research with and about TMS. Studies are now uncovering the mechanisms by which TMS affects the brain. It does not "erase the hard-drive" of the brain, and it has many demonstrated research and clinical uses. This article reviews the major recent advances with this interesting noninvasive technique for stimulating the brain, critically reviewing the data on whether TMS has anticonvulsant effects or modulates cortical-limbic loops.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12468991     DOI: 10.1097/00124509-200212000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J ECT        ISSN: 1095-0680            Impact factor:   3.635


  28 in total

1.  Preventing relapse to smoking with transcranial magnetic stimulation: Feasibility and potential efficacy.

Authors:  Christine E Sheffer; Warren K Bickel; Thomas H Brandon; Christopher T Franck; Darwin Deen; Luana Panissidi; Syed Amir Abdali; Jami C Pittman; Sara E Lunden; Neelam Prashad; Ria Malhotra; Antonio Mantovani
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  A randomized, controlled investigation of motor cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) effects on quantitative sensory measures in healthy adults: evaluation of TMS device parameters.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Borckardt; Scott T Reeves; Will Beam; Mark P Jensen; Richard H Gracely; Sophie Katz; Arthur R Smith; Alok Madan; David Patterson; Mark S George
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 3.  Therapeutic impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robabeh Soleimani; Mir Mohammad Jalali; Tolou Hasandokht
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Brain stimulation patterns emulating endogenous thalamocortical input to parvalbumin-expressing interneurons reduce nociception in mice.

Authors:  Yeowool Huh; Dahee Jung; Taeyoon Seo; Sukkyu Sun; Su Hyun Kim; Hyewhon Rhim; Sooyoung Chung; Chong-Hyun Kim; Youngwoo Kwon; Marom Bikson; Yong-An Chung; Jeansok J Kim; Jeiwon Cho
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 5.  Pregnancy and depression: exploring a new potential treatment option.

Authors:  Deborah R Kim; Juan Gonzalez; John P O'Reardon
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Pilot Trial of Pre-Supplementary Motor Area (Pre-SMA) 1 Hz rTMS to Treat Essential Tremor.

Authors:  Bashar W Badran; Chloe E Glusman; Chris W Austelle; Shonna Jenkins; William H DeVries; Virginia Galbraith; Tiffani Thomas; Thomas G Adams; Mark S George; Gonzalo J Revuelta
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  High- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation differentially activates c-Fos and zif268 protein expression in the rat brain.

Authors:  Selcen Aydin-Abidin; Jörn Trippe; Klaus Funke; Ulf T Eysel; Alia Benali
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  The expanding evidence base for rTMS treatment of depression.

Authors:  Mark S George; Joseph J Taylor; E Baron Short
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.741

9.  Focal electrical stimulation as an effective sham control for active rTMS and biofeedback treatments.

Authors:  Christine E Sheffer; Mark S Mennemeier; Reid D Landes; John Dornhoffer; Timothy Kimbrell; Warren K Bickel; Sharon Brackman; Kenneth C Chelette; Ginger Brown; Mai Vuong
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2013-09

10.  Individualized rTMS neuronavigated according to regional brain metabolism ((18)FGD PET) has better treatment effects on auditory hallucinations than standard positioning of rTMS: a double-blind, sham-controlled study.

Authors:  Monika Klirova; Jiri Horacek; Tomas Novak; Jan Cermak; Filip Spaniel; Lucie Skrdlantova; Pavel Mohr; Cyril Höschl
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.