Literature DB >> 12463909

Evaluating the prevalence, content and readability of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) web pages on the internet.

Smitha Sagaram1, Muhammad Walji, Elmer Bernstam.   

Abstract

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is growing rapidly. As CAM is relatively unregulated, it is important to evaluate the type and availability of CAM information. The goal of this study is to deter-mine the prevalence, content and readability of online CAM information based on searches for arthritis, diabetes and fibromyalgia using four common search engines. Fifty-eight of 599 web pages retrieved by a "condition search" (9.6%) were CAM-oriented. Of 216 CAM pages found by the "condition" and "condition + herbs" searches, 78% were authored by commercial organizations, whose pur-pose involved commerce 69% of the time and 52.3% had no references. Although 98% of the CAM information was intended for consumers, the mean read-ability was at grade level 11. We conclude that consumers searching the web for health information are likely to encounter consumer-oriented CAM advertising, which is difficult to read and is not supported by the conventional literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12463909      PMCID: PMC2244422     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  9 in total

1.  Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet. The case of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  P K Beredjiklian; D J Bozentka; D R Steinberg; J Bernstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Quality of care information for consumers on the Internet.

Authors:  M H Oermann; F L Wilson
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.597

3.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish.

Authors:  G K Berland; M N Elliott; L S Morales; J I Algazy; R L Kravitz; M S Broder; D E Kanouse; J A Muñoz; J A Puyol; M Lara; K E Watkins; H Yang; E A McGlynn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 May 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Urology and the Internet: an evaluation of internet use by urology patients and of information available on urological topics.

Authors:  G O Hellawell; K J Turner; K J Le Monnier; S F Brewster
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Surfing for back pain patients: the nature and quality of back pain information on the Internet.

Authors:  L Li; E Irvin; J Guzmán; C Bombardier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Vascular surgery and the Internet: a poor source of patient-oriented information.

Authors:  L C Soot; G L Moneta; J M Edwards
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Can clients understand our instructions?

Authors:  L D Streiff
Journal:  Image J Nurs Sch       Date:  1986

8.  Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey.

Authors:  D M Eisenberg; R C Kessler; M I Van Rompay; T J Kaptchuk; S A Wilkey; S Appel; R B Davis
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-09-04       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey.

Authors:  D M Eisenberg; R B Davis; S L Ettner; S Appel; S Wilkey; M Van Rompay; R C Kessler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-11       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Identifying Complementary and Alternative Medicine Usage Information from Internet Resources. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vivekanand Sharma; John H Holmes; Indra N Sarkar
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 2.  Completeness, accuracy, and presentation of information on interactions between prescription drugs and alternative medicines: an internet review.

Authors:  Lou Ann Scarton; Guilherme Del Fiol; Qing Treitler-Zeng
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2013

3.  Efficacy of quality criteria to identify potentially harmful information: a cross-sectional survey of complementary and alternative medicine web sites.

Authors:  Muhammad Walji; Smitha Sagaram; Deepak Sagaram; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Craig Johnson; Nadeem Q Mirza; Elmer V Bernstam
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Effective Application of Knowledge Management in Evidence-based Chinese Medicine: A Case Study.

Authors:  Angela Weihong Yang; Garry Allan; Chun Guang Li; Charlie Changli Xue
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 2.629

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.