Literature DB >> 12463767

Bilayered bioengineered skin substitute (Apligraf): a review of its use in the treatment of venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers.

Monique P Curran1, Greg L Plosker.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The bilayered bioengineered skin substitute (BBSS) [Apligraf] is used for the treatment of venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers. It has an epidermal layer formed from human keratinocytes and a dermal layer composed of human fibroblasts in a bovine type I collagen matrix. BBSS does not contain any antigen-presenting cells such as Langerhans cells, dermal dendritic cells, endothelial cells or leucocytes. In clinical trials, there was no evidence of clinical rejection and immunological tests indicated no humoral or cellular response to the keratinocytes or fibroblasts of BBSS. Further clinical trials are required to identify the exact mechanism of action of BBSS in chronic wounds. BBSS plus compression therapy was well tolerated and was superior in efficacy to compression therapy alone in a multicentre, randomised trial in patients with venous leg ulcers. At 6 months' follow-up, complete wound healing occurred in 63 versus 49% of patients and the median time to wound closure was 61 versus 181 days. In a subgroup of patients with hard-to-heal ulcers (>1 year's duration), wound healing was achieved in significantly more patients (47 vs 19%) and the median time to wound healing was significantly shorter (181 days vs not attained). In a multicentre, randomised trial, BBSS was well tolerated and effective in patients with full-thickness neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. Ulcer healing occurred in significantly more patients (56 vs 38%) and the median time to wound healing was shorter (65 vs 90 days) with BBSS than with saline-moistened gauze at 12 weeks' follow-up. Patients in both groups also received standard diabetic foot care. The cost effectiveness of BBSS in patients with chronic ulcers has yet to be examined in well designed, prospective clinical trials. However, according to a modelled analysis incorporating data from a multicentre randomised trial, BBSS was cost effective in patients with hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers. The average annual medical cost of managing patients with ulcers of >1 year's duration was estimated to be 20,041 US dollars per patient treated with BBSS plus compression therapy and 27,493 US dollars per patient treated with compression therapy alone (1996 costs).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trials have shown that BBSS in conjunction with standard compression therapy was effective and well tolerated in patients with venous leg ulcers, especially patients with ulcers of >6 months' duration or that extended to the subcutaneous tissue. In addition, BBSS in conjunction with standard diabetic foot care was effective and well tolerated in patients with full-thickness neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. BBSS represents a useful adjuvant to standard ulcer therapy in patients with venous leg ulcers or full-thickness neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers that do not respond to conventional ulcer therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12463767     DOI: 10.2165/00063030-200216060-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BioDrugs        ISSN: 1173-8804            Impact factor:   5.807


  28 in total

Review 1.  A dressing history.

Authors:  Douglas Queen; Heather Orsted; Hiromi Sanada; Geoff Sussman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Wound healing on athymic mice with engineered skin substitutes fabricated with keratinocytes harvested from an automated bioreactor.

Authors:  Balaji Kalyanaraman; Steven T Boyce
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Fibronectin matrix mimetics promote full-thickness wound repair in diabetic mice.

Authors:  Daniel C Roy; Nancie A Mooney; Carol H Raeman; Diane Dalecki; Denise C Hocking
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Secreted HoxA3 Promotes Epidermal Proliferation and Angiogenesis in Genetically Modified Three-Dimensional Composite Skin Constructs.

Authors:  Jennifer H Kuo; Ileana Cuevas; Amy Chen; Ashley Dunn; Mauricio Kuri; Nancy Boudreau
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  A simple material model to generate epidermal and dermal layers in vitro for skin regeneration.

Authors:  Ching-Ting Tsao; Matthew Leung; Julia Yu-Fong Chang; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 6.  An update and review of cell-based wound dressings and their integration into clinical practice.

Authors:  Austin Pourmoussa; Daniel J Gardner; Maxwell B Johnson; Alex K Wong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

Review 7.  Clinical applications of naturally derived biopolymer-based scaffolds for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Whitney L Stoppel; Chiara E Ghezzi; Stephanie L McNamara; Lauren D Black; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  A Bioengineered Human Skin Tissue for the Treatment of Infected Wounds.

Authors:  Christina L Thomas-Virnig; B Lynn Allen-Hoffmann
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  In vivo assessment of printed microvasculature in a bilayer skin graft to treat full-thickness wounds.

Authors:  Maria Yanez; Julio Rincon; Aracely Dones; Carmelo De Maria; Raoul Gonzales; Thomas Boland
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  A three species model to simulate application of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy to chronic wounds.

Authors:  Jennifer A Flegg; Donald L S McElwain; Helen M Byrne; Ian W Turner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.