Literature DB >> 12462686

Distortions in panoramic radiographs.

D K L Yeo1, T J Freer, P J Brockhurst.   

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the factors affecting linear distortion in orthopantomography A test model was constructed with metallic rods positioned to simulate maxillary teeth from the first permanent molar to the lateral incisor. In addition to examining the effects of varying the tilts of the test rods in a mesiodistal or bucco-palatal direction, spatial position changes (sagittal displacement, transverse displacement and horizontal rotation) of the test model were evaluated by determining the magnification changes in the width and length of the test rods. Results showed that significant errors occurred with all variations in magnification when test rods were inclined buccopalatally (p < 0.001) at or exceeding 5 degrees relative to the true perpendicular, and for spatial positioning errors (p < 0.05) at or exceeding +/- 5 degrees and +/- 5 mm. Bucco-palatally inclined objects in the lateral incisor-canine region were particularly susceptible to large changes in horizontal magnification. Linear measurements and clinical assessments from panoramic radiographs should therefore be undertaken cautiously. To minimise errors in orthopantomography, it is important to position the patient in the focal trough precisely according to the manufacturer's specification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12462686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Orthod J        ISSN: 0587-3908


  9 in total

1.  Sex Determination of Adult Human Maxillary Sinuses on Panoramic Radiographs.

Authors:  Cristhiane Leao de Queiroz; Andrea Sayuri Silveira Dias Terada; Thais Uenoyama Dezem; Lais Gomes de Araújo; Rodrigo Galo; Christiano Oliveira-Santos; Ricardo Henrique Alves da Silva
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2016-09

2.  A comparative study between data obtained from conventional lateral cephalometry and reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images.

Authors:  Suseok Oh; Ci-Young Kim; Jongrak Hong
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-06-27

3.  Dilemma of gonial angle measurement: Panoramic radiograph or lateral cephalogram.

Authors:  Pillai Devu Radhakrishnan; Nilambur Kovilakam Sapna Varma; Vallikat Velath Ajith
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2017-06-22

4.  Implant-to-nasal floor dimensions projected by panoramic radiographs in the maxillary incisor-canine region: implications for dental implant treatment.

Authors:  Annika Bertram; Alexander W Eckert; Rüdiger Emshoff
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.634

5.  Common errors in digital panoramic radiographs of patients with mixed dentition and patients with permanent dentition.

Authors:  Benjamin Peretz; Maya Gotler; Israel Kaffe
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-02-08

6.  Correlation between spatial resolution and ball distortion rate of panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Han-Gyeol Yeom; Jo-Eun Kim; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Won-Jin Yi; Min-Suk Heo; Sam-Sun Lee; Soon-Chul Choi
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Accuracy of linear vertical measurements in posterior mandible on panoramic view.

Authors:  Abdolaziz Haghnegahdar; Pegah Bronoosh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-03

8.  Configuration of the inferior alveolar canal as detected by cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Umadevi P Nair; Mehran H Yazdi; Gautam M Nayar; Heath Parry; Rujuta A Katkar; Madhu K Nair
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-11

9.  Implant-to-root dimensions projected by panoramic radiographs inthe maxillary canine-premolar region: implications for dental implant treatment.

Authors:  Annika Bertram; Alexander W Eckert; Rüdiger Emshoff
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.930

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.