Literature DB >> 12462264

Performance of male pigs immunized against GnRH is related to the time of onset of biological response.

J A Turkstra1, X Y Zengt, J T h M van Diepent, A W Jongbloed, H B Oonk, D F M van de Wielt, R H Meloen.   

Abstract

In this study, the performance of male pigs immunized against GnRH was determined in relation to the onset of their biological response to the immunization. Pigs were immunized at 9 and 17 wk of age and were housed in a pen together with both a surgically castrated and an intact boar littermate. Feed intake was restricted to 2.8 to 3.2 times maintenance requirement for energy. Animals were weighed weekly and slaughtered at 108 kg BW. Depending on the time of onset of the response after immunization in terms of biological effects, immunized pigs were retrospectively grouped into two categories. One category consisted of the immunized pigs, which had undetectable or low levels of LH and testosterone at the time of booster immunization-known as "early" responding immunocastrates (E-IM, n = 8), whereas the "late" responding immunocastrates (L-IM, n = 7) had substantial LH and testosterone levels at that time. This dichotomy of the response to immunization also was reflected in testis weight, with 17 g and 40 g for E-IM and L-IM pigs, respectively. At slaughter, testis size and weight were reduced (P < 0.001) in the immunocastrated pigs as compared to the intact boars. Androstenone concentrations in backfat of all immunocastrated pigs were undetectable. Growth performance (i.e., ADG and feed efficiency [FE, g gain/kg feed]), was better in boars and L-IM pigs than in surgical castrates and E-IM pigs (P < 0.05). Average daily gain and FE did not differ between E-IM pigs and the surgical castrates, but intact boars performed better than L-IM (P < 0.02). There were no significant differences in carcass quality (backfat thickness and meat percentage) between boars and surgical castrates at slaughter. However, for both characteristics L-IM pigs and intact boars performed better (P < 0.03) than E-IM pigs. Thus, growth performance in L-IM is better than in either E-IM or surgical castrates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12462264     DOI: 10.2527/2002.80112953x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Effect of active immunization against GnRH on testosterone concentration, libido and sperm quality in mature AI boars.

Authors:  Ronaldas Bilskis; Neringa Sutkeviciene; Vita Riskeviciene; Aloyzas Januskauskas; Henrikas Zilinskas
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 1.695

2.  Carcass characteristics and qualitative attributes of pork from immunocastrated animals.

Authors:  Fabiana Ribeiro Caldara; Marta Moi; Luan Sousa Dos Santos; Ibiara Correia de Lima Almeida Paz; Rodrigo Garófallo Garcia; Irenilza de Alencar Nääs; Alexandre Rodrigo Mendes Fernandes
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Active immunization with GnRH-tandem-dimer peptide in young male rats reduces serum reproductive hormone concentrations, testicular development and spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Xing-Fa Han; Jun-Li Li; Yu-Qin Zhou; Xiao-Hua Ren; Gong-Cheng Liu; Xiao-Han Cao; Xiao-Gang Du; Xian-Yin Zeng
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Early Immunocastration of Pigs: From Farming to Meat Quality.

Authors:  Daniela Werner; Lisa Baldinger; Ralf Bussemas; Sinje Büttner; Friedrich Weißmann; Marco Ciulu; Johanna Mörlein; Daniel Mörlein
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Efficiency of genomic prediction for boar taint reduction in Danish Landrace pigs.

Authors:  B Lukić; R Pong-Wong; S J Rowe; D J de Koning; I Velander; C S Haley; A L Archibald; J A Woolliams
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.