OBJECTIVE: To investigate estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) levels in imprint specimens obtained at breast surgery and to compare their correlation with that of standard methods. STUDY DESIGN: Imprint specimens for cytology were obtained from 101 mass-forming lesions in 66 patients, and specimens were frozen in liquid nitrogen for later assay. The imprint specimens were immunocytochemically (ICC) stained by monoclonal antibody to ER or PR; diaminobenzidine-stained cell nuclei in clusters were regarded as positive. Tissue specimens were assayed by the standard method of dextran-coated charcoal assay (DCC) and enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: Forty-five primary breast cancer lesions, 2 contralateral breast cancer, 49 dissected nodes and 5 benign breast lesions were collected. The correlation between DCC and ICC was 81% (82/101) for ER and 74% (66/101) for PR. That between EIA and ICC was 88% (88/99) for ER and 80% (79/100) for PR, higher than that between DCC and ICC for ER and PR. CONCLUSION: ICC assessment of ER or PR on imprint cytology is a promising clinical test with an acceptable correlation.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) levels in imprint specimens obtained at breast surgery and to compare their correlation with that of standard methods. STUDY DESIGN: Imprint specimens for cytology were obtained from 101 mass-forming lesions in 66 patients, and specimens were frozen in liquid nitrogen for later assay. The imprint specimens were immunocytochemically (ICC) stained by monoclonal antibody to ER or PR; diaminobenzidine-stained cell nuclei in clusters were regarded as positive. Tissue specimens were assayed by the standard method of dextran-coated charcoal assay (DCC) and enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: Forty-five primary breast cancer lesions, 2 contralateral breast cancer, 49 dissected nodes and 5 benign breast lesions were collected. The correlation between DCC and ICC was 81% (82/101) for ER and 74% (66/101) for PR. That between EIA and ICC was 88% (88/99) for ER and 80% (79/100) for PR, higher than that between DCC and ICC for ER and PR. CONCLUSION: ICC assessment of ER or PR on imprint cytology is a promising clinical test with an acceptable correlation.