Literature DB >> 12461710

Pharmaceutical research involving the homeless.

Tom L Beauchamp1, Bruce Jennings, Eleanor D Kinney, Robert J Levine.   

Abstract

Discussions of research involving vulnerable populations have left the homeless comparatively ignored. Participation by these subjects in drug studies has the potential to be upsetting, inconvenient, or unpleasant. Participation occasionally produces injury, health emergencies, and chronic health problems. Nonetheless, no ethical justification exists for the categorical exclusion of homeless persons from research. The appropriate framework for informed consent for these subjects of pharmaceutical research is not a single event of oral or written consent, but a multi-staged arrangement of disclosure, dialogue, and permission-giving. Payments and other rewards in biomedical research raise issues of whether it is ethical to offer inducements to the homeless in exchange for participation in drug studies. Such inducements can influence desperate persons who are seriously lacking in resources. The key is to strike a balance between a rate of payment high enough that it does not exploit subjects by underpayment and low enough that it does not create an irresistible inducement. This proposal does not underestimate the risks of research, which are often overestimated and need to be appraised in light of the relevant empirical literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12461710     DOI: 10.1076/jmep.27.5.547.10320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  8 in total

1.  Challenging assumptions about minority participation in US clinical research.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher; Corey A Kalbaugh
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Where are all the bioethicists when you need them?

Authors:  Subrata Chattopadhyay; John J Gillon; Raymond De Vries
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Vulnerable populations in research: the case of the seriously ill.

Authors:  Philip J Nickel
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2006

4.  Does money make bioethics go 'round?

Authors:  Raymond G De Vries; Carla C Keirns
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  The battering of informed consent.

Authors:  M Kottow
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Perceptions of financial payment for research participation among African-American drug users in HIV studies.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Slomka; Sheryl McCurdy; Eric A Ratliff; Sandra Timpson; Mark L Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Payments to normal healthy volunteers in phase 1 trials: avoiding undue influence while distributing fairly the burdens of research participation.

Authors:  Ana S Iltis
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2009-02-03

8.  Serial Participation and the Ethics of Phase 1 Healthy Volunteer Research.

Authors:  Rebecca L Walker; Marci D Cottingham; Jill A Fisher
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2018-01-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.