Literature DB >> 12461627

Mechanisms and significance of spike-timing dependent plasticity.

Uma R Karmarkar1, Mark T Najarian, Dean V Buonomano.   

Abstract

Hebb's original postulate left two important issues unaddressed: (i) what is the effective time window between pre- and postsynaptic activity that will result in potentiation? and (ii) what is the learning rule that underlies decreases in synaptic strength? While research over the past 2 decades has addressed these questions, several studies within the past 5 years have shown that synapses undergo long-term depression (LTD) or long-term potentiation (LTP) depending on the order of activity in the pre- and postsynaptic cells. This process has been referred to as spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP). Here we discuss the experimental data on STDP, and develop models of the mechanisms that may underlie it. Specifically, we examine whether the standard model of LTP and LTD in which high and low levels of Ca(2+) produce LTP and LTD, respectively, can also account for STDP. We conclude that the standard model can account for a type of STDP in which, counterintuitively, LTD will be observed at some intervals in which the presynaptic cell fires before the postsynaptic cell. This form of STDP will also be sensitive to parameters such as the presence of an after depolarization following an action potential. Indeed, the sensitivity of this type of STDP to experimental parameters suggests that it may not play an important physiological role in vivo. We suggest that more robust forms of STDP, which do not exhibit LTD at pre-before-post intervals, are not accounted for by the standard model, and are likely to rely on a second coincidence detector in addition to the NMDA receptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12461627     DOI: 10.1007/s00422-002-0351-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  22 in total

1.  Spatial localization of synapses required for supralinear summation of action potentials and EPSPs.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Urakubo; Takeshi Aihara; Shinya Kuroda; Masataka Watanabe; Shunsuke Kondo
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  What is the appropriate description level for synaptic plasticity?

Authors:  Harel Z Shouval
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A biophysically-based neuromorphic model of spike rate- and timing-dependent plasticity.

Authors:  Guy Rachmuth; Harel Z Shouval; Mark F Bear; Chi-Sang Poon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Distinct coincidence detectors govern the corticostriatal spike timing-dependent plasticity.

Authors:  Elodie Fino; Vincent Paille; Yihui Cui; Teresa Morera-Herreras; Jean-Michel Deniau; Laurent Venance
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Bimodal stimulus timing-dependent plasticity in primary auditory cortex is altered after noise exposure with and without tinnitus.

Authors:  Gregory J Basura; Seth D Koehler; Susan E Shore
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Two coincidence detectors for spike timing-dependent plasticity in somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Vanessa A Bender; Kevin J Bender; Daniel J Brasier; Daniel E Feldman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Spatiotemporal asymmetry of associative synaptic plasticity in fear conditioning pathways.

Authors:  Ryong-Moon Shin; Evgeny Tsvetkov; Vadim Y Bolshakov
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Self-influencing synaptic plasticity: recurrent changes of synaptic weights can lead to specific functional properties.

Authors:  Minija Tamosiunaite; Bernd Porr; Florentin Wörgötter
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 1.621

9.  A model for synaptic development regulated by NMDA receptor subunit expression.

Authors:  Shigeru Kubota; Tatsuo Kitajima
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 1.621

10.  Measures of cortical plasticity after transcranial paired associative stimulation predict changes in electroencephalogram slow-wave activity during subsequent sleep.

Authors:  Reto Huber; Sara Määttä; Steve K Esser; Simone Sarasso; Fabio Ferrarelli; Adam Watson; Florinda Ferreri; Michael J Peterson; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.