Literature DB >> 12461269

Initial experience in humans with a new retrievable inferior vena cava filter.

Murray R Asch1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate preliminary clinical experience in humans with the Recovery nitinol filter (RNF) for the inferior vena cava, especially the efficacy of the device and safety of its retrieval.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients were followed up to assess for filter efficacy and for ability to remove the filter.
RESULTS: Sixteen men and 16 women aged 18-83 years (mean, 53 years) underwent treatment with the RNF. Indications for placement were recent pulmonary embolism (n = 16), recent deep venous thrombosis (n = 20), and/or prophylaxis (n = 2). Four patients had contraindications to anticoagulant therapy, and four had complications from anticoagulant therapy. The filter was successfully placed in 32 patients. In 24 (100%) of 24 patients, the filter was successfully retrieved with a jugular approach. The mean implantation period was 53 days (range, 5-134 days). Trapped thrombus was seen within the filter in seven cases. In one patient with a large trapped thrombus, the filter was noted to have migrated 4 cm cephalad. There were no episodes of pulmonary embolism or insertion-site thrombosis.
CONCLUSION: This preliminary experience in humans confirms the efficacy of the RNF. It also demonstrates the feasibility and safety of retrieval up to 134 days after implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12461269     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2252011825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  23 in total

1.  Metastatic involvement of a retrieved inferior vena cava filter.

Authors:  Ziv Neeman; Aaron Auerbach; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Retrieval of Recovery IVC Filter After 1,463-Day Implantation.

Authors:  Michael S Stecker; Alisa Suzuki; Jonathan D Gates
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 4.  Optional inferior vena caval filters: where are we now?

Authors:  A N Keeling; T B Kinney; M J Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Venous thromboembolic disease: the use of "optional" inferior vena cava filters.

Authors:  Anthony C Venbrux; Elizabeth A Ignacio; Shawn N Sarin; Amy P Soltes; Noel C Haskins; Dmitri Gagarin
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Complications of inferior vena caval filters.

Authors:  Thuong G Van Ha
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Retrieval of a wall-embedded recovery inferior vena cava filter using rigid bronchoscopy forceps.

Authors:  Sarah B White; S William Stavropoulos
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Rates and predictors of plans for inferior vena cava filter retrieval in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  John F Mission; Robert K Kerlan; Justin H Tan; Margaret C Fang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Complications related to deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in trauma: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Indraneel Datta; Chad G Ball; Lucas Rudmik; S Morad Hameed; John B Kortbeek
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2010-01-06

10.  Venous thromboembolism after removal of retrievable inferior vena cava filters.

Authors:  Takuji Yamagami; Osamu Tanaka; Rika Yoshimatsu; Hiroshi Miura; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.