Literature DB >> 12461026

The efficacy and safety of linezolid as treatment for Staphylococcus aureus infections in compassionate use patients who are intolerant of, or who have failed to respond to, vancomycin.

Pamela A Moise1, Alan Forrest, Mary C Birmingham, Jerome J Schentag.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus continues to increase annually. Unfortunately, only a few therapeutic agents are available for the treatment of patients with such infections and all of the existing drugs have limitations. A pressing need exists, therefore, to identify new antibiotics for use in this clinical setting. The efficacy and safety of linezolid were studied in a compassionate use treatment programme and the results of treating a subset of patients with S. aureus infections are presented here.
METHODS: Patients received linezolid in a dosage of 600 mg intravenously (iv) and/or orally twice daily. Clinical and bacteriological responses were assessed after a minimum of 7 days and following completion of therapy.
RESULTS: Seven hundred and ninety-six patients who suffered 828 episodes of infection were enrolled in the linezolid compassionate use protocol. Of these, 183 patients received linezolid for 191 infections caused by S. aureus; in 151 cases, patients were intolerant of vancomycin, had a mixed S. aureus/vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infection or had no iv access, and, in 40 cases, patients had failed to respond to treatment with vancomycin. The median age of the patients was 57 years (range 14-93 years) and 53.9% were female. The predominant sites of infection were as follows: bone or joint (27.2%); skin and skin structure (25.1%); bloodstream (20.9%); and lower respiratory tract (12.6%). The clinical success rates in the clinically evaluable and all-treated populations were 83.9% and 62.3%, respectively, whereas the bacteriological eradication rates were 76.9% and 70.2% in the bacteriologically evaluable and all-treated populations, respectively. Linezolid was well tolerated. In 76 (39.8%) of the 191 episodes of infection, patients experienced one or more adverse events or exhibited one or more abnormal laboratory results; in 35 (18.3%) of the 191 cases it was necessary to discontinue treatment. Gastrointestinal tract-related symptoms (nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea) were the most common possibly or probably related adverse events and the most common reasons for drug discontinuation.
CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid was effective and well tolerated in patients with S. aureus infections who were enrolled in this compassionate use protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12461026     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkf215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  13 in total

Review 1.  Low-level vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus--an Australian perspective.

Authors:  B P Howden; P B Ward; P D R Johnson; P G P Charles; M L Grayson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  First detection of an invasive Staphylococcus aureus strain (D958) with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  S Al-Obeid; Q Haddad; A Cherkaoui; J Schrenzel; P François
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in an in vitro catheter-related biofilm model correlates with poor therapeutic outcomes in experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Wessam Abdelhady; Arnold S Bayer; Kati Seidl; Cynthia C Nast; Megan R Kiedrowski; Alexander R Horswill; Michael R Yeaman; Yan Q Xiong
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Relationship of agr expression and function with virulence and vancomycin treatment outcomes in experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Kati Seidl; Liang Chen; Arnold S Bayer; Wessam Abdel Hady; Barry N Kreiswirth; Yan Q Xiong
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  Pamela A Moise-Broder; Alan Forrest; Mary C Birmingham; Jerome J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Vancomycin in vitro bactericidal activity and its relationship to efficacy in clearance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Pamela A Moise; George Sakoulas; Alan Forrest; Jerome J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Clinical management of septic arthritis.

Authors:  Katie A Sharff; Eric P Richards; John M Townes
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 8.  Linezolid: in infants and children with severe Gram-positive infections.

Authors:  Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson; Karen L Goa
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

9.  Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  George Sakoulas; Pamela A Moise-Broder; Jerome Schentag; Alan Forrest; Robert C Moellering; George M Eliopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Intramuscular Injection Abscess Due to VRSA: A New Health Care Challenge.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Ganeshkumar Jayasree Rohinikumar; Arif Gul; Varatharaj Mounasamy
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.