Literature DB >> 12460843

Comparison of triage assessments among pediatric registered nurses and pediatric emergency physicians.

Sylvie Bergeron1, Serge Gouin, Benoît Bailey, Hema Patel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare triage level assignments, using simulated written case scenarios, in a pediatric emergency department (ED) among registered nurses (RNs) and pediatric emergency physicians (PEPs) and to compare the triage level assignments among RNs and PEPs with a consensus criterion standard.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional mailed questionnaire survey. The study was conducted at a pediatric tertiary care center with more than 65,000 annual patient visits. Participants were PEPs and RNs working in the ED. Dillman's Total Design Method, with three mailouts, was used for questionnaire construction and implementation. The survey included 55 case scenarios of patients presenting to the ED. Participants were instructed to assign triage level on each case, using the following four-level triage scale: 1 = resuscitation/emergent, 2 = urgent, 3 = less-urgent, and 4 = non-urgent. A priori, all cases were assigned a triage level by consensus agreement of three PEPs, using established triage guidelines from the RNs' teaching manual. Kappa statistics (95% CI) and the mean percentage of correct responses (+/-1 SD) were calculated.
RESULTS: There was a 100% response rate (39 RNs, 24 PEPs). The kappa level of agreement (95% CI) was 0.453 (0.447 to 0.459) among the RNs and was 0.419 (0.409 to 0.429) among the PEPs. The mean percentage of correct responses (+/-1 SD) for the RNs was 64.2% (+/-8.0%) and for the PEPs was 53.5% (+/-8.1%, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference within groups by experience level (< 10 vs. > or =10 years) or by the type of work schedule (day vs. evening vs. overnight) or full-time vs. part-time status.
CONCLUSIONS: The level of agreement and accuracy of triage assignment was only moderate for both RNs and PEPs. Triage, a crucial step in emergency care, requires improved measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12460843     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01608.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  9 in total

Review 1.  Are Pediatric Triage Systems Reliable in the Emergency Department?

Authors:  Mohsen Ebrahimi; Amir Mirhaghi; Zohre Najafi; Hojjat Shafaee; Mahin Hamechizfahm Roudi
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 1.112

2.  The Singapore Paediatric Triage Scale Validation Study.

Authors:  Sashikumar Ganapathy; Joo Guan Yeo; Xing Hui Michelle Thia; Geok Mei Andrea Hei; Lai Peng Tham
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 1.858

3.  Telephone triage by nurses in primary care out-of-hours services in Norway: an evaluation study based on written case scenarios.

Authors:  Elisabeth Holm Hansen; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  Validity and Reliability of the Emergency Severity Index and Australasian Triage System in Pediatric Emergency Care of Mofid Children's Hospital in Iran.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Ghafarypour-Jahrom; Mehrdad Taghizadeh; Kamran Heidari; Hojat Derakhshanfar
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2018-10

5.  Responsibility-Evading Performance: The Experiences of Healthcare Staff about Triage in Emergency Departments: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Asghar Sherafat; Aliakbar Vaezi; Mohammadreza Vafaeenasab; Mohammadhassan Ehrampoush; Hossein Fallahzadeh; Hossein Tavangar
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

6.  Pediatric triage variations among nurses, pediatric and emergency residents using the Canadian triage and acuity scale.

Authors:  Saleh Alshaibi; Tala AlBassri; Suliman AlQeuflie; Winnie Philip; Nesrin Alharthy
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2021-11-22

7.  Effectiveness of a five-level Paediatric Triage System: an analysis of resource utilisation in the emergency department in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yu-Che Chang; Chip-Jin Ng; Chang-Teng Wu; Li-Chin Chen; Jih-Chang Chen; Kuang-Hung Hsu
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  The Reliability of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amir Mirhaghi; Abbas Heydari; Reza Mazlom; Mohsen Ebrahimi
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2015-07

9.  One-two-triage: validation and reliability of a novel triage system for low-resource settings.

Authors:  Ayesha Khan; S V Mahadevan; Andrea Dreyfuss; James Quinn; Joan Woods; Koy Somontha; Matthew Strehlow
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.740

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.