Literature DB >> 12460784

Results of randomised studies of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) with two different ifosfamide regimens in first- and second-line chemotherapy in advanced soft tissue sarcoma patients.

A T van Oosterom1, H T Mouridsen, O S Nielsen, P Dombernowsky, K Krzemieniecki, I Judson, L Svancarova, D Spooner, C Hermans, M Van Glabbeke, J Verweij.   

Abstract

The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of two regimens of ifosfamide in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma patients given as first- and second-line chemotherapy. Two different schedules of ifosfamide were investigated in a randomised manner: Ifosfamide was given either at a dose of 5 g/m(2) over 24 h (5 g/m(2)/1 day), every 3 weeks or at a dose of 3 g/m(2) per day, administered over 4 h on three consecutive days (3 g/m(2)/3 days), every 3 weeks. Both schedules were given as first-line or second-line chemotherapy. A total of 182 patients was entered, 103 in first- and 79 in second-line, of whom 8 patients were ineligible, 5 in the first- and 3 in the second-line study. Most patients had a leiomyosarcoma, 46 of the 98 in the first-line and 34 of the 76 in the second-line. The two study arms were well balanced in both the first- and second-lines with respect to sex, age and performance status. In first-line treatment, 5 g/m(2)/1 day yielded five partial responses (PR) (Response Rate (RR) 10%), versus 12 PR (RR 25%) for the 3 g/m(2)/3 days. As second-line treatment, the 24-h infusion yielded: one CR and one PR (RR 6%) and the 3-day schedule one CR and two PR (RR 8%). Survival did not differ between the two regimens. The major World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4 toxicities encountered were: leucopenia in 19% of all courses in the first-line and 32% in the second-line with the 5 g/m(2)/1 day, while for the 3 g/m(2)/3 days schedule the rates were 57 and 63% respectively. Grade 3 or 4 infections were seen in 4% of patients treated with 5 g/m(2)/1 day first-line and 10% of patients given 3 g/m(2)/3 days, both as first- and second-lines. No such infections were seen in patients receiving 5 g/m(2)/1 day as second line treatment. In advanced soft-tissue sarcomas in the first-line, ifosfamide 3 g/m(2), given over 4 h on three consecutive days, is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity while the 5 g/m(2) over 24 hours schedule resulted in a disappointing response rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12460784     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00491-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  45 in total

1.  Systematic therapy for unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Sherif S Morgan; Lee D Cranmer
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Phase I/II study of docetaxel, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin in advanced, recurrent, or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

Authors:  Revathi Suppiah; Laura Wood; Paul Elson; George T Budd
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with ifosfamide in patients with advanced sarcoma: a Spanish group for research on sarcomas (GEIS) study.

Authors:  J Martín-Liberal; A López-Pousa; J Martín Broto; R Cubedo; O Gallego; E Brendel; O M Tirado; X García del Muro
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Analysis of prognostic factors impacting oncologic outcomes after neoadjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Brian K Bednarski; Dejka M Araujo; Min Yi; Keila E Torres; Alexander Lazar; Jonathan C Trent; Janice N Cormier; Peter W T Pisters; Dina Chelouche Lev; Raphael E Pollock; Barry W Feig; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Plus Sirolimus in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: a Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS) Study.

Authors:  Juan Martin-Liberal; Antonio López-Pousa; Javier Martínez-Trufero; Javier Martín-Broto; Ricardo Cubedo; Javier Lavernia; Andrés Redondo; José Antonio López-Martín; Nùria Mulet-Margalef; Xavier Sanjuan; Òscar M Tirado; Xavier Garcia-Del-Muro
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.493

6.  A retrospective pooled analysis of trabectedin safety in 1,132 patients with solid tumors treated in phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  Axel Le Cesne; Alejandro Yovine; Jean-Yves Blay; Suzette Delaloge; Robert G Maki; Jean-Louis Misset; Pilar Frontelo; Antonio Nieto; Juhui James Jiao; George D Demetri
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Leiomyosarcoma: Principles of management.

Authors:  Juan Martin-Liberal
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2013-11

Review 8.  Salvage Therapy in Advanced Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Alessandro Comandone; Fausto Petrelli; Antonella Boglione; Sandro Barni
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-08-23

9.  Pulmonary metastasectomy from soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Rodrigo Afonso da Silva Sardenberg; Luiz Poli de Figueiredo; Fábio José Haddad; Jefferson Luiz Gross; Riad Naim Younes
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Robert Grimer; Ian Judson; David Peake; Beatrice Seddon
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2010-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.