Literature DB >> 12460751

Arsenic, drinking water, and health: a position paper of the American Council on Science and Health.

Kenneth G Brown1, Gilbert L Ross.   

Abstract

The purpose of this American Council on Science and Health report is to review issues and sources of uncertainty affecting assessment of potential health risks related to drinking water in the United States. Some background is included on how these issues arose, as is a review of the 1999 National Research Council report (with references to an updated version), to formulate a position based on the current science concerning how much of a risk of adverse health effects actually exists from arsenic in drinking water in the United States. ACSH concludes that there is clear evidence that chronic exposure to inorganic arsenic at concentrations of at least several hundred micrograms per liter may cause: (1) cancer of skin, bladder, lung (and possibly several other internal organs, including kidney, liver, and prostate), and (2) noncancer effects, including classic cutaneous manifestations that are distinctive and characteristic of chronic arsenic poisoning (diffuse or spotted hyperpigmentation and palmar-plantar hyperkeratoses). Noncancer effects may be multisystemic, with some evidence of peripheral vascular, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, and adverse reproductive outcomes. Further study is needed to know if beneficial effects of arsenic in animal studies apply to humans. ACSH concludes that there is little, if any, evidence of a detrimental health effect in humans from inorganic arsenic in drinking water at the current maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 50 microg/L or below, either in the United States or elsewhere. As noted in the 1999 NRC report, "No human studies of sufficient statistical power or scope have examined whether consumption of arsenic in drinking water at the current MCL results in an increased incidence of cancer or noncancer effects" (NRC, 1999, p. 7). Based on our review, described in this article, ACSH finds that the limitations of the epidemiological data available and the state-of-the-science on the mode-of-action of arsenic toxicity, including can cer, are inadequate to support the conclusion that there are adverse health effects in the United States from arsenic in drinking water at or below the limit of 50 microg/L. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science (USA)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12460751     DOI: 10.1006/rtph.2002.1573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  24 in total

1.  Risk assessment for arsenic-contaminated groundwater along River Indus in Pakistan.

Authors:  Unaib Rabbani; Gohar Mahar; Azhar Siddique; Zafar Fatmi
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Low-level arsenic exposure from drinking water is associated with prostate cancer in Iowa.

Authors:  Taehyun Roh; Charles F Lynch; Peter Weyer; Kai Wang; Kevin M Kelly; Gabriele Ludewig
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  KRAS-retroviral fusion transcripts and gene amplification in arsenic-transformed, human prostate CAsE-PE cancer cells.

Authors:  B Alex Merrick; Dhiral P Phadke; Meredith A Bostrom; Ruchir R Shah; Garron M Wright; Xinguo Wang; Oksana Gordon; Katherine E Pelch; Scott S Auerbach; Richard S Paules; Michael J DeVito; Michael P Waalkes; Erik J Tokar
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Hepatic transcriptomic responses in mice exposed to arsenic and different fat diet.

Authors:  Hui Hou; Yue Yu; Zhuoyan Shen; Su Liu; Bing Wu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Environmental arsenic exposure and serum matrix metalloproteinase-9.

Authors:  Jefferey L Burgess; Margaret Kurzius-Spencer; Mary Kay O'Rourke; Sally R Littau; Jason Roberge; Maria Mercedes Meza-Montenegro; Luis Enrique Gutiérrez-Millán; Robin B Harris
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 6.  Arsenic Exposure and Immunotoxicity: a Review Including the Possible Influence of Age and Sex.

Authors:  Daniele Ferrario; Laura Gribaldo; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2016-03

7.  Measured versus modeled dietary arsenic and relation to urinary arsenic excretion and total exposure.

Authors:  Margaret Kurzius-Spencer; Mary K O'Rourke; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Vern Hartz; Robin B Harris; Jefferey L Burgess
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  Activating transcription factor 4 underlies the pathogenesis of arsenic trioxide-mediated impairment of macrophage innate immune functions.

Authors:  Ritesh K Srivastava; Changzhao Li; Yong Wang; Zhiping Weng; Craig A Elmets; Kevin S Harrod; Jessy S Deshane; Mohammad Athar
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  Persistence of DNA damage following exposure of human bladder cells to chronic monomethylarsonous acid.

Authors:  S M Wnek; M K Medeiros; K E Eblin; A J Gandolfi
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  ARS5 is a component of the 26S proteasome complex, and negatively regulates thiol biosynthesis and arsenic tolerance in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Dong-Yul Sung; Tae-Houn Kim; Elizabeth A Komives; David G Mendoza-Cózatl; Julian I Schroeder
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.417

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.