OBJECTIVE: Increased cardiovascular mortality and carotid atherosclerosis have been observed in hypopituitary patients with untreated GH deficiency (GHD), but results are contradictory and relations to cardiovascular risk factors are not clear. The aim of this study was to investigate intima-media thickness (IMT) in relation to cardiovascular risk factors in adults with GHD. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study of 21 men and 13 women with GHD, but without cardiovascular disease, compared to two healthy control groups matched for age, sex and smoking habits. One control group was matched for body mass index (BMI) and the other group was nonobese. MEASUREMENTS: IMT of the carotid and femoral arteries, blood pressure, blood samples and anthropometric data. RESULTS: Patients had 12% thicker composite carotid IMT [(IMT of common carotid artery + IMT of bulb)/2] compared to nonobese controls (P = 0.022), but IMT was not different compared to BMI-matched controls. Femoral IMT did not differ between patients and controls. Patients had higher waist : hip ratio (WHR), heart rate, serum triglycerides and fasting insulin concentrations in combination with lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and smaller low-density lipoprotein (LDL) peak particle size compared to both nonobese and to BMI-matched controls. This cardiovascular risk pattern was more pronounced in female patients than in male patients compared to their gender controls. Carotid IMT was related to age, serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and smoking in the patient group. Only age was independently related to carotid IMT in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that high BMI in GH-deficient patients contribute to their increased intima-media thickness. However, several cardiovascular risk factors are present in this patient group independent of their increased BMI, especially in women.
OBJECTIVE: Increased cardiovascular mortality and carotid atherosclerosis have been observed in hypopituitary patients with untreated GH deficiency (GHD), but results are contradictory and relations to cardiovascular risk factors are not clear. The aim of this study was to investigate intima-media thickness (IMT) in relation to cardiovascular risk factors in adults with GHD. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study of 21 men and 13 women with GHD, but without cardiovascular disease, compared to two healthy control groups matched for age, sex and smoking habits. One control group was matched for body mass index (BMI) and the other group was nonobese. MEASUREMENTS: IMT of the carotid and femoral arteries, blood pressure, blood samples and anthropometric data. RESULTS:Patients had 12% thicker composite carotid IMT [(IMT of common carotid artery + IMT of bulb)/2] compared to nonobese controls (P = 0.022), but IMT was not different compared to BMI-matched controls. Femoral IMT did not differ between patients and controls. Patients had higher waist : hip ratio (WHR), heart rate, serum triglycerides and fasting insulin concentrations in combination with lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and smaller low-density lipoprotein (LDL) peak particle size compared to both nonobese and to BMI-matched controls. This cardiovascular risk pattern was more pronounced in female patients than in male patients compared to their gender controls. Carotid IMT was related to age, serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and smoking in the patient group. Only age was independently related to carotid IMT in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that high BMI in GH-deficientpatients contribute to their increased intima-media thickness. However, several cardiovascular risk factors are present in this patient group independent of their increased BMI, especially in women.
Authors: Manthos G Giannoulis; Finbarr C Martin; K Sreekumaran Nair; A Margot Umpleby; Peter Sonksen Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2012-03-20 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Sina Jasim; Fares Alahdab; Ahmed T Ahmed; Shrikant Tamhane; Larry J Prokop; Todd B Nippoldt; M Hassan Murad Journal: Endocrine Date: 2016-11-05 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Sina Jasim; Fares Alahdab; Ahmed T Ahmed; Shrikant U Tamhane; Anu Sharma; Diane Donegan; Todd B Nippoldt; M Hassan Murad Journal: Endocrine Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: M Scacchi; E Valassi; A I Pincelli; L M Fatti; F Pecori Giraldi; P Ascoli; R Viarengo; B Cestaro; F Cavagnini; R Cazzola Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: A Colao; S Spiezia; C Di Somma; R Pivonello; P Marzullo; F Rota; T Musella; R S Auriemma; M C De Martino; G Lombardi Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Catherine Beauregard; Andrea L Utz; Amber E Schaub; Lisa Nachtigall; Beverly M K Biller; Karen K Miller; Anne Klibanski Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Hideo Makimura; Takara Stanley; David Mun; Cindy Chen; Jeffrey Wei; Jean M Connelly; Linda C Hemphill; Steven K Grinspoon Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 5.958