Literature DB >> 12459662

Modeling of the sedative and airway obstruction effects of propofol in patients with Parkinson disease undergoing stereotactic surgery.

Neus Fábregas1, Javier Rapado, Pedro L Gambús, Ricard Valero, Enrique Carrero, Lydia Salvador, Miguel A Nalda-Felipe, Iñaki F Trocóniz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Functional stereotactic surgery requires careful titration of sedation since patients with Parkinson disease need to be rapidly awakened for testing. This study reports a population pharmacodynamic model of propofol sedation and airway obstruction in the Parkinson disease population.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients with advanced Parkinson disease undergoing functional stereotactic surgery were included in the study and received propofol target-controlled infusion to achieve an initial steady state concentration of 1 microg/ml. Sedation was measured using the Ramsay Sedation Scale. Airway obstruction was measured using a four-category score. Blood samples were drawn for propofol measurement. Individual pharmacokinetic profiles were constructed nonparametrically using linear interpolation. Time course of sedation and respiratory effects were described with population pharmacodynamic models using NONMEM. The probability (P) of a given level of sedation or airway obstruction was related to the estimated effect-site concentration of propofol (Ce) using a logistic regression model.
RESULTS: The concentrations predicted by the target-controlled infusion system generally exceeded the measured concentrations. The estimates of C(50) for Ramsay scores 3, 4, and 5 were 0.1, 1.02, and 2.28 microg/ml, respectively. For airway obstruction scores 2 and 3, the estimates of C(50) were 0.32 and 2.98 microg/ml, respectively. Estimates of k(e0) were 0.24 and 0.5 1/min for the sedation and respiratory effects, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic behavior of propofol in patients with Parkinson disease differs with respect to the population from which the model used by the target-controlled infusion device was developed. Based on the results from the final models, a typical steady state plasma propofol concentration of 0.35 microg/ml eliciting a sedation score of 3 with only minimal, if any, airway obstruction has been defined as the therapeutic target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12459662     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200212000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  7 in total

Review 1.  Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of anesthetics.

Authors:  Erik Olofsen; Albert Dahan
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling in anaesthesia.

Authors:  Pedro L Gambús; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Practical considerations and nuances in anesthesia for patients undergoing deep brain stimulation implantation surgery.

Authors:  Danielle Teresa Scharpf; Mayur Sharma; Milind Deogaonkar; Ali Rezai; Sergio D Bergese
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-07-28

Review 4.  Anaesthesia for deep brain stimulation: a review.

Authors:  Ryan Grant; Shaun E Gruenbaum; Jason Gerrard
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 5.  [Anesthesiological aspects of deep brain stimulation : special features of implementation and dealing with brain pacemaker carriers].

Authors:  M Seemann; N Zech; M Lange; J Hansen; E Hansen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Propofol-induced loss of consciousness is associated with a decrease in thalamocortical connectivity in humans.

Authors:  Mahsa Malekmohammadi; Collin M Price; Andrew E Hudson; Jasmine A T DiCesare; Nader Pouratian
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 15.255

7.  Pharmacodynamic Estimate of Propofol-Induced Sedation and Airway Obstruction Effects in Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome.

Authors:  Bon-Nyeo Koo; Seokyung Shin; So Yeon Kim; Young Ran Kang; Kyu Hee Jeong; Dong Woo Han
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.759

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.