Literature DB >> 12459448

DNA replication arrest in XP variant cells after UV exposure is diverted into an Mre11-dependent recombination pathway by the kinase inhibitor wortmannin.

C L Limoli1, R Laposa, J E Cleaver.   

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation produces DNA photoproducts that are blocks to DNA replication by normal replicative polymerases. A specialized, damage-specific, distributive polymerase, Pol H or Pol h, that is the product of the hRad30A gene, is required for replication past these photoproducts. This polymerase is absent from XP variant (XP-V) cells that must employ other mechanisms to negotiate blocks to DNA replication. These mechanisms include the use of alternative polymerases or recombination between sister chromatids. Replication forks arrested by UV damage in virus transformed XP-V cells degrade into DNA double strand breaks that are sites for recombination, but in normal cells arrested forks may be protected from degradation by p53 protein. These breaks are sites for binding a protein complex, hMre11/hRad50/Nbs1, that colocalizes with H2AX and PCNA, and can be visualized as immunofluorescent foci. The protein complexes need phosphorylation to activate their DNA binding capacity. Incubation of UV irradiated XP-V cells with the irreversible kinase inhibitor wortmannin, however, increased the yield of Mre11 focus-positive cells. One interpretation of this observation is that two classes of kinases are involved after UV irradiation. One would be a wortmannin-resistant kinase that phosphorylates the Mre11 complex. The other would be a wortmannin-sensitive kinase that phosphorylates and activates the p53/large T in SV40 transformed XP-V cells. The sensitive class corresponds to the PI3-kinases of ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK, but the resistant class remains to be identified. Alternatively, the elevated yield of Mre11 foci positive cells following wortmannin treatment may reflect an overall perturbation to the signaling cascades regulated by wortmannin-sensitive PI3 related kinases. In this scenario, wortmannin could compromise damage inducible-signaling pathways that maintain the stability of stalled forks, resulting in a further destabilization of stalled forks that then degrade, with the formation of DNA double strand breaks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12459448     DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00257-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  9 in total

1.  H2AX phosphorylation within the G1 phase after UV irradiation depends on nucleotide excision repair and not DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Thomas M Marti; Eli Hefner; Luzviminda Feeney; Valerie Natale; James E Cleaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Integrating S-phase checkpoint signaling with trans-lesion synthesis of bulky DNA adducts.

Authors:  Laura R Barkley; Haruo Ohmori; Cyrus Vaziri
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.194

3.  Histone H2AX phosphorylation in response to changes in chromatin structure induced by altered osmolarity.

Authors:  Jennifer Baure; Atefeh Izadi; Vannina Suarez; Erich Giedzinski; James E Cleaver; John R Fike; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Novel function of the flap endonuclease 1 complex in processing stalled DNA replication forks.

Authors:  Li Zheng; Mian Zhou; Qing Chai; Jay Parrish; Ding Xue; Steve M Patrick; John J Turchi; Steven M Yannone; David Chen; Binghui Shen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 5.  Translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Julian E Sale
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  A minority of foci or pan-nuclear apoptotic staining of gammaH2AX in the S phase after UV damage contain DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Sebastien de Feraudy; Ingrid Revet; Vladimir Bezrookove; Luzviminda Feeney; James E Cleaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Alternative cyclin D1 splice forms differentially regulate the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Zhiping Li; Xuanmao Jiao; Chenguang Wang; L Andrew Shirley; Hany Elsaleh; Olav Dahl; Min Wang; Evi Soutoglou; Erik S Knudsen; Richard G Pestell
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  p53 suppression overwhelms DNA polymerase eta deficiency in determining the cellular UV DNA damage response.

Authors:  Rebecca R Laposa; Luzviminda Feeney; Eileen Crowley; Sebastien de Feraudy; James E Cleaver
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-09-05

9.  Localization of recombination proteins and Srs2 reveals anti-recombinase function in vivo.

Authors:  Rebecca C Burgess; Michael Lisby; Veronika Altmannova; Lumir Krejci; Patrick Sung; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 10.539

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.