Literature DB >> 12459214

Brain activation evoked by perception of gaze shifts: the influence of context.

Kevin A Pelphrey1, Jeffrey D Singerman, Truett Allison, Gregory McCarthy.   

Abstract

Prior studies from our laboratory [Journal of Neuroscience 18 (1998) 2188; Cognitive Neuropsychology 17 (2000) 221] have demonstrated that discrete regions of the superior temporal sulcus (STS) are activated when a subject views a face in which the eyes shift their gaze. Here we investigated the degree to which activity in the STS and other brain regions is modulated by the context of the perceived gaze shift; that is, when the shift correctly or incorrectly acquires a visual target. Fifteen subjects participated in an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment in which they viewed an animated face that remained present throughout each run. On each of 21 trials within each run, a small checkerboard appeared and flickered at one of six locations within the character's visual field. On "correct" trials, the character shifted its gaze towards the checkerboard after a delay of 1 or 3s. On "incorrect" trials, the character shifted its gaze towards empty space after the same delays. On "no shift" trials, the character's eyes did not move. Significantly larger hemodynamic responses (HDR) were evoked by gaze shifts compared to no gaze shifts in primarily right hemisphere STS. The gaze-evoked HDR was significantly delayed in peak amplitude for 3s compared to 1s shifts. For 1s shifts, a strong effect of context was observed in which errors evoked a HDR with extended duration. Although this study focused upon STS, similar effects were also observed in the intraparietal sulcus and fusiform gyrus.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12459214     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00146-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  109 in total

1.  Mental state attribution and the temporoparietal junction: an fMRI study comparing belief, emotion, and perception.

Authors:  Deborah Zaitchik; Caren Walker; Saul Miller; Pete LaViolette; Eric Feczko; Bradford C Dickerson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 2.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of gaze-expression interactions in face processing and social attention.

Authors:  Reiko Graham; Kevin S Labar
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Guided saccades modulate object and face-specific activity in the fusiform gyrus.

Authors:  James P Morris; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus.

Authors:  Antonia F de C Hamilton; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Occipitotemporal activation evoked by the perception of human bodies is modulated by the presence or absence of the face.

Authors:  James P Morris; Kevin A Pelphrey; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Andrew P Bayliss; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Face processing without awareness in the right fusiform gyrus.

Authors:  James P Morris; Kevin A Pelphrey; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Brain mechanisms for social perception: lessons from autism and typical development.

Authors:  Kevin A Pelphrey; Elizabeth J Carter
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Broad autism phenotype in typically developing children predicts performance on an eye-tracking measure of joint attention.

Authors:  Meghan R Swanson; Gayle C Serlin; Michael Siller
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-03

10.  Brain mechanisms for representing what another person sees.

Authors:  Ratha D Heyda; Steven R Green; Brent C Vander Wyk; James P Morris; Kevin A Pelphrey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.