Literature DB >> 12458652

The relationships between dose and antihypertensive effect of four AT1-receptor blockers. Differences in potency and efficacy.

Dag Elmfeldt1, Bertil Olofsson, Peter Meredith.   

Abstract

The relationships between dose and antihypertensive effect of the first four available AT1-receptor blockers. i.e. losartan, valsartan, irbesartan and candesartan, were assessed based on data obtained from the FDA's evaluation reports of the respective New Drug Application files. All available randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies in adult men and women with mild to moderate primary diastolic hypertension were included, provided that the reduction in trough (24 h post-dose) supine or sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) had been assessed using the intention-to-treat approach. All studies had an initial single-blind placebo run-in period followed by at least 4 weeks double-blind treatment. The selected studies were included in a meta-analysis of the dose-response relationship for each drug. The dose-response relationship was estimated by fitting the placebo-adjusted, weighted mean reductions in DBP for each dose of the drug to an Emax model. The Emax (maximal effect at an infinitely large dose) for the reduction in DBP, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals in brackets, were found to be 5.6 (3.6-7.5) mmHg for losartan, 5.8 (5.0-6.6) mmHg for valsartan, 6.9 (5.9-7.9) mmHg for irbesartan and 7.5 (6.1-8.9) mmHg for candesartan (p = 0.014, candesartan vs valsartan). In conclusion, this investigation demonstrates that candesartan can reduce DBP significantly more than valsartan, and is supportive of previous head-to-head comparisons, which have proven candesartan to have a greater antihypertensive effect than losartan at recommended doses. Thus, differences in efficacy between different AT1-receptor blockers do exist, and should have implications for the choice of AT1-receptor blocker when treating patients with hypertension, considering the importance of good blood pressure control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12458652     DOI: 10.1080/080370502320779502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press        ISSN: 0803-7051            Impact factor:   2.835


  9 in total

Review 1.  Comparing angiotensin II receptor blockers on benefits beyond blood pressure.

Authors:  Helmy M Siragy
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  An overview of candesartan in clinical practice.

Authors:  Zeeshan Khawaja; Christopher S Wilcox
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2011-08

Review 3.  Candesartan cilexetil: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in chronic heart failure and hypertension.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Combination therapy with candesartan cilexetil 32 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg provides the full additive antihypertensive effect of the components: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in primary care.

Authors:  Istvan Edes
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Antihypertensive agents and renal transplantation.

Authors:  G Vergoulas
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 6.  Role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of hypertension in patients aged >or=65 years.

Authors:  Alan H Gradman
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Management of hypertension with fixed dose combinations of candesartan cilexetil and hydrochlorothiazide: patient perspectives and clinical utility.

Authors:  Thomas Mengden; Sakir Uen; Peter Bramlage
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-12-29

Review 8.  Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers in combination with hydrochlorothiazide: a review of the factorial-design studies.

Authors:  C Ventika S Ram
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of candesartan cilexetil in hypertensive children aged 6 to 17 years.

Authors:  Howard Trachtman; James W Hainer; Jennifer Sugg; Renli Teng; Jonathan M Sorof; Jerilynn Radcliffe
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.738

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.