Literature DB >> 12458088

Motif prediction in ribosomal RNAs Lessons and prospects for automated motif prediction in homologous RNA molecules.

N B Leontis1, J Stombaugh, E Westhof.   

Abstract

The traditional way to infer RNA secondary structure involves an iterative process of alignment and evaluation of covariation statistics between all positions possibly involved in basepairing. Watson-Crick basepairs typically show covariations that score well when examples of two or more possible basepairs occur. This is not necessarily the case for non-Watson-Crick basepairing geometries. For example, for sheared (trans Hoogsteen/Sugar edge) pairs, one base is highly conserved (always A or mostly A with some C or U), while the other can vary (G or A and sometimes C and U as well). RNA motifs consist of ordered, stacked arrays of non-Watson-Crick basepairs that in the secondary structure representation form hairpin or internal loops, multi-stem junctions, and even pseudoknots. Although RNA motifs occur recurrently and contribute in a modular fashion to RNA architecture, it is usually not apparent which bases interact and whether it is by edge-to-edge H-bonding or solely by stacking interactions. Using a modular sequence-analysis approach, recurrent motifs related to the sarcin-ricin loop of 23S RNA and to loop E from 5S RNA were predicted in universally conserved regions of the large ribosomal RNAs (16S- and 23S-like) before the publication of high-resolution, atomic-level structures of representative examples of 16S and 23S rRNA molecules in their native contexts. This provides the opportunity to evaluate the predictive power of motif-level sequence analysis, with the goal of automating the process for predicting RNA motifs in genomic sequences. The process of inferring structure from sequence by constructing accurate alignments is a circular one. The crucial link that allows a productive iteration of motif modeling and realignment is the comparison of the sequence variations for each putative pair with the corresponding isostericity matrix to determine which basepairs are consistent both with the sequence and the geometrical data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12458088     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9084(02)01463-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochimie        ISSN: 0300-9084            Impact factor:   4.079


  60 in total

1.  The common and the distinctive features of the bulged-G motif based on a 1.04 A resolution RNA structure.

Authors:  Carl C Correll; Jutta Beneken; Matthew J Plantinga; Melissa Lubbers; Yuen-Ling Chan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Tools for the automatic identification and classification of RNA base pairs.

Authors:  Huanwang Yang; Fabrice Jossinet; Neocles Leontis; Li Chen; John Westbrook; Helen Berman; Eric Westhof
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Predicting and modeling RNA architecture.

Authors:  Eric Westhof; Benoît Masquida; Fabrice Jossinet
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  The identification of novel RNA structural motifs using COMPADRES: an automated approach to structural discovery.

Authors:  Leven M Wadley; Anna Marie Pyle
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Evidence for the existence of the loop E motif of Potato spindle tuber viroid in vivo.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Xuehua Zhong; Asuka Itaya; Biao Ding
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  The building blocks and motifs of RNA architecture.

Authors:  Neocles B Leontis; Aurelie Lescoute; Eric Westhof
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Tertiary structural and functional analyses of a viroid RNA motif by isostericity matrix and mutagenesis reveal its essential role in replication.

Authors:  Xuehua Zhong; Neocles Leontis; Shuiming Qian; Asuka Itaya; Yijun Qi; Kathleen Boris-Lawrie; Biao Ding
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Coplanar and coaxial orientations of RNA bases and helices.

Authors:  Alain Laederach; Joseph M Chan; Armin Schwartzman; Eric Willgohs; Russ B Altman
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 4.942

9.  Automated motif extraction and classification in RNA tertiary structures.

Authors:  Mahassine Djelloul; Alain Denise
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 4.942

10.  Analysis of four-way junctions in RNA structures.

Authors:  Christian Laing; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.