Literature DB >> 12457502

Blood pressure measurement--does anyone do it right?: An assessment of the reliability of equipment in use and the measurement techniques of clinicians.

J T McVicker1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy and consistency of blood pressure measurement techniques among individual clinicians and the reliability of the equipment in everyday use.
DESIGN: Professional survey. PARTICIPANTS: The senior nurse at each of 28 clinics was sent two questionnaires about equipment, and 55 health professionals were sent a questionnaire about their measurement technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Faulty equipment, date of last service, named individual responsible for equipment, knowledge of protocols regarding mercury spillage, correct technique for measuring blood pressure, training in blood pressure measurement.
RESULTS: An 82% response rate on equipment showed it to be in relatively good condition, although maintenance problems and some potentially dangerous health and safety issues were highlighted. A 67% response rate on measurement technique showed that there was considerable variation in individual measurement technique that could lead to inappropriate action. COMMENT: This study has lead to replacing all mercury with aneroid devices, and to the development of staff guidelines and updating on measurement techniques. A re-audit will be carried out to complete the cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12457502     DOI: 10.1783/147118901101195407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1471-1893


  5 in total

1.  Variability independent of mean blood pressure as a real-world measure of cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Joseph E Ebinger; Matthew Driver; David Ouyang; Patrick Botting; Hongwei Ji; Mohamad A Rashid; Ciantel A Blyler; Natalie A Bello; Florian Rader; Teemu J Niiranen; Christine M Albert; Susan Cheng
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Beyond the Evidence of the New Hypertension Guidelines. Blood pressure measurement - is it good enough for accurate diagnosis of hypertension? Time might be in, for a paradigm shift (I).

Authors:  Cornel Pater
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-04-06

3.  Prospective Register Of patients undergoing repeated OFfice and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (PROOF-ABPM): protocol for an observational cohort study.

Authors:  James P Sheppard; Una Martin; Paramjit Gill; Richard Stevens; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  James P Sheppard; Richard Stevens; Paramjit Gill; Una Martin; Marshall Godwin; Janet Hanley; Carl Heneghan; F D Richard Hobbs; Jonathan Mant; Brian McKinstry; Martin Myers; David Nunan; Alison Ward; Bryan Williams; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Prospective external validation of the Predicting Out-of-OFfice Blood Pressure (PROOF-BP) strategy for triaging ambulatory monitoring in the diagnosis and management of hypertension: observational cohort study.

Authors:  James P Sheppard; Una Martin; Paramjit Gill; Richard Stevens; Fd Richard Hobbs; Jonathan Mant; Marshall Godwin; Janet Hanley; Brian McKinstry; Martin Myers; David Nunan; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-06-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.