Literature DB >> 12456509

Overall and event-free survival are not improved by the use of myeloablative therapy following intensified chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma: a prospective randomized phase 3 study.

Christine M Segeren1, Pieter Sonneveld, Bronno van der Holt, Edo Vellenga, Alexandra J Croockewit, Gregor E G Verhoef, Jan J Cornelissen, Martijn R Schaafsma, Marinus H J van Oers, Pierre W Wijermans, Wim E Fibbe, Shulamit Wittebol, Harry C Schouten, Marinus van Marwijk Kooy, Douwe H Biesma, Joke W Baars, Rosalyn Slater, Monique M C Steijaert, Ivon Buijt, Henk M Lokhorst.   

Abstract

We compared the efficacy of intensified chemotherapy followed by myeloablative therapy and autologous stem cell rescue with intensified chemotherapy alone in patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma. There were 261 eligible patients younger than 66 years with stage II/III multiple myeloma who were randomized after remission induction therapy with vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone (VAD) to receive intensified chemotherapy, that is, melphalan 140 mg/m(2) administered intravenously in 2 doses of 70 mg/m(2) (intermediate-dose melphalan [IDM]) without stem cell rescue (n = 129) or the same regimen followed by myeloablative therapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, total body irradiation, and autologous stem cell reinfusion (n = 132). Interferon-alpha-2a was given as maintenance. Of the eligible patients, 79% received both cycles of IDM and 79% of allocated patients actually received myeloablative treatment. The response rate (complete remission [CR] plus partial remission [PR]) was 88% in the intensified chemotherapy group versus 95% in the myeloablative treatment group. CR was significantly higher after myeloablative therapy (13% versus 29%; P =.002). With a median follow-up of 33 months (range, 8-65 months), the event-free survival (EFS) was not different between the treatments (median 21 months versus 22 months; P =.28). Time to progression (TTP) was significantly longer after myeloablative treatment (25 months versus 31 months; P =.04). The overall survival (OS) was not different (50 months versus 47 months; P =.41). Intensified chemotherapy followed by myeloablative therapy as first-line treatment for multiple myeloma resulted in a higher CR and a longer TTP when compared with intensified chemotherapy alone. However, it did not result in a better EFS and OS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12456509     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  23 in total

Review 1.  Autologous stem cell transplantation in hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Norbert-Claude Gorin
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2004-10-07

2.  Bcl-xl expression in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S D P W M Peeters; S Hovenga; S Rosati; E Vellenga
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Comparable outcomes in nonsecretory and secretory multiple myeloma after autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Shaji Kumar; Waleska S Pérez; Mei-Jie Zhang; Karen Ballen; Asad Bashey; L Bik To; Christopher N Bredeson; Mitchell S Cairo; Gerald J Elfenbein; César O Freytes; Robert Peter Gale; John Gibson; Robert A Kyle; Martha Q Lacy; Hillard M Lazarus; Philip L McCarthy; Gustavo A Milone; Jan S Moreb; Santiago Pavlovsky; Donna E Reece; David H Vesole; Peter H Wiernik; Parameswaran Hari
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Controversies in multiple myeloma: to transplant or not?

Authors:  Isabel Ruth Preeshagul; Koen Van Besien; Tomer M Mark
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.952

5.  Bone marrow angiogenesis and progression in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Roberto Ria; Antonia Reale; Annunziata De Luisi; Arianna Ferrucci; Michele Moschetta; Angelo Vacca
Journal:  Am J Blood Res       Date:  2011-06-08

6.  A prospective study of lenalidomide monotherapy for relapse after Allo-SCT for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  W I Bensinger; D J Green; N Burwick; P S Becker
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  International Myeloma Working Group consensus approach to the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Michele Cavo; S Vincent Rajkumar; Antonio Palumbo; Philippe Moreau; Robert Orlowski; Joan Bladé; Orhan Sezer; Heinz Ludwig; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Michel Attal; Pieter Sonneveld; Mario Boccadoro; Kenneth C Anderson; Paul G Richardson; William Bensinger; Hans E Johnsen; Nicolaus Kroeger; Gösta Gahrton; P Leif Bergsagel; David H Vesole; Hermann Einsele; Sundar Jagannath; Ruben Niesvizky; Brian G M Durie; Jesus San Miguel; Sagar Lonial
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-3L: assessing the external validity of existing mapping algorithms.

Authors:  Brett Doble; Paula Lorgelly
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Autologous transplant vs oral chemotherapy and lenalidomide in newly diagnosed young myeloma patients: a pooled analysis.

Authors:  F Gay; S Oliva; M T Petrucci; V Montefusco; C Conticello; P Musto; L Catalano; A Evangelista; S Spada; P Campbell; R Ria; M Salvini; M Offidani; A M Carella; P Omedé; A M Liberati; R Troia; A M Cafro; A Malfitano; A P Falcone; T Caravita; F Patriarca; A Nagler; A Spencer; R Hajek; A Palumbo; M Boccadoro
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  Current approaches to the initial treatment of symptomatic multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jagoda K Jasielec; Andrzej J Jakubowiak
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.