Literature DB >> 12456459

Maximum minute ventilation test for the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.

Michael S Stix1, Cornelius J O'Connor.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: One of the distinguishing features of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is that it can cause upper airway obstruction, even when it is correctly inserted behind the cricoid cartilage. We used a hyperventilation test, the maximum minute ventilation test (MMV test), to aid in the diagnosis of upper airway obstruction after PLMA insertion. The patient was briefly hyperventilated for 15 s yielding a MMV value equal to 4 x (breaths/15 s) x (exhaled tidal volume). MMV values were collected in 317 adult women and men over 6 mo. Critical MMV values were obtained in 17 of 317 patients, 15 of 317 (4.7%) of which were due to insertion of the PLMA. The PLMA was removed in seven of 317 (2.2%) patients. The most common cause of upper airway obstruction due to the PLMA was laryngeal obstruction. This refers to compression of supraglottic and glottic structures with resulting narrowing and compromise of the airway. A second, much less common, form of airway obstruction was bilateral cuff infolding with or without downfolding of the epiglottis. Finally, we discuss the margin of safety for minute ventilation, defined as the excess of the MMV over and above basal minute ventilation requirements for the patient. With critical MMV, the margin of safety is drastically reduced or nonexistent. IMPLICATIONS: One of the distinguishing features of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is that it can cause upper airway obstruction, even when it is correctly inserted behind the cricoid cartilage. We used a hyperventilation test, the maximum minute ventilation test, to aid in the diagnosis of upper airway obstruction after PLMA insertion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12456459     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200212000-00059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Second generation laryngeal masks : expanded indications].

Authors:  A Timmermann; E A Nickel; F Pühringer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Use of the size 3 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Results of a randomized crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway].

Authors:  K Goldmann; C Roettger; H Wulf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Troubleshooting ProSeal LMA.

Authors:  Bimla Sharma; Jayashree Sood; Chand Sahai; V P Kumra
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2009-08

4.  Negative pressure pulmonary oedema following use of ProSeal LMA.

Authors:  Richa Jain; Mahendra Kumar; Zainab A Haq; Ashim Banerjee
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-03

5.  Size 2.5 ProSeal(™) LMA: Is it associated with increased attempts at insertion?

Authors:  Aparna Sinha; Bimla Sharma; Jayashree Sood
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-01

6.  The case for a 3rd generation supraglottic airway device facilitating direct vision placement.

Authors:  André A J Van Zundert; Chandra M Kumar; Tom C R V Van Zundert; Stephen P Gatt; Jaideep J Pandit
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.502

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.