Literature DB >> 12455839

Foraging enrichment for stabled horses: effects on behaviour and selection.

D Goodwin1, H P B Davidson, P Harris.   

Abstract

The restricted access to pasture experienced by many competition horses has been linked to the exhibition of stereotypic and redirected behaviour patterns. It has been suggested that racehorses provided with more than one source of forage are less likely to perform these patterns; however, the reasons for this are currently unclear. To investigate this in 4 replicated trials, up to 12 horses were introduced into each of 2 identical stables containing a single forage, or 6 forages for 5 min. To detect novelty effects, in the first and third trials the single forage was hay. In the second and fourth, it was the preferred forage from the preceding trial. Trials were videotaped and 12 mutually exclusive behaviour patterns compared. When hay was presented as the single forage (Trials 1 and 3), all recorded behaviour patterns were significantly different between stables; e.g. during Trial 3 in the 'Single' stable, horses looked over the stable door more frequently (P<0.001), moved for longer (P<0.001), foraged on straw bedding longer (P<0.001), and exhibited behaviour indicative of motivation to search for alternative resources (P<0.001) more frequently. When a previously preferred forage was presented as the single forage (Trials 2 and 4) behaviour was also significantly different between stables, e.g in Trial 4 horses looked out over the stable door more frequently (P<0.005) and foraged for longer in their straw bedding (P<0.005). Further study is required to determine whether these effects persist over longer periods. However, these trials indicate that enrichment of the stable environment through provision of multiple forages may have welfare benefits for horses, in reducing straw consumption and facilitating the expression of highly motivated foraging behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12455839     DOI: 10.2746/042516402776250450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Equine Vet J        ISSN: 0425-1644            Impact factor:   2.888


  8 in total

Review 1.  Animal models of restricted repetitive behavior in autism.

Authors:  Mark H Lewis; Yoko Tanimura; Linda W Lee; James W Bodfish
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Management factors affecting stereotypies and body condition score in nonracing horses in Prince Edward Island.

Authors:  Julie L Christie; Caroline J Hewson; Christopher B Riley; Mary A McNiven; Ian R Dohoo; Luis A Bate
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Management methods to improve the welfare of horses used in research.

Authors:  Valerie S M Jonckheer-Sheehy; Katherine A Houpt
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 12.625

4.  Psychological factors affecting equine performance.

Authors:  Sebastian D McBride; Daniel S Mills
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  The pathophysiology of restricted repetitive behavior.

Authors:  Mark Lewis; Soo-Jeong Kim
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  Foraging enrichment modulates open field response to monosodium glutamate in mice.

Authors:  Olakunle J Onaolapo; Adejoke Y Onaolapo; Moses A Akanmu; Gbola Olayiwola
Journal:  Ann Neurosci       Date:  2015-07

7.  Could work be a source of behavioural disorders? A study in horses.

Authors:  Martine Hausberger; Emmanuel Gautier; Véronique Biquand; Christophe Lunel; Patrick Jégo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of breed, management and personality on cortisol reactivity in sport horses.

Authors:  Fay J Sauer; Marco Hermann; Alessandra Ramseyer; Dominik Burger; Stefanie Riemer; Vinzenz Gerber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.