Literature DB >> 12455733

Improving accuracy of the chemiluminescent analyser for measurement of nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide in respired gas.

Robert F Salamonsen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to improve the accuracy of the chemiluminescent analyser in the measurement of nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in both dry and humidified gas mixtures containing oxygen (O2) in varying concentrations. This work was performed because initial attempts to determine rate constants for the decay of NO and rates of formation of NO2 were unsuccessful.
METHODS: Equations were developed by which the raw output signal of the analyser could be corrected for errors arising from variations in sensitivity of the analysis cell, degree of conversion of NO2 to NO and degradation of NO to nitrogen (N2) in the converter prior to analysis. Once correction factors were derived from calibration, the analyser was used to measure rate of decay of 40 ppm nitric oxide in both dry and humidified gases containing either 21%, 60% or 100% O2 in N2.
RESULTS: Correction factors obtained from calibration corrected falls in sensitivity to a maximum of 28%, variations in degree of conversion of NO2 to NO from 62-96% and degradation of NO from 2-8% in the converter before analysis depending on O2 concentration and humidification. When the calibrated machine was used to measure decay of NO, an excellent fit (r2 > 0.95) with a hyperbolic function was obtained confirming that rate of decay is proportional to oxygen O2 concentration and square of NO concentration. A rate constant per unit O2 concentration of 9.40E-10 ppm(-2) min(-1) for humidified gas was significantly higher than 8.27E-10 ppm(-2) min(-1) for "dry" gas (P = 0.008) at 22 degrees C. Rise in NO2 predicted from the "wet" rate constant achieved 3ppm in 65 seconds with 40 ppm NO in 100% oxygen and 107 sec. in 60% oxygen.
CONCLUSION: This study indicates that for accurate analysis of NO and NO2 concentrations in airway gases a rigorous calibration of the instrument for the conditions applying in the experiment is mandatory. Once this is achieved the instrument is capable of precise analysis of both gases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12455733     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020788417368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  7 in total

1.  Safety guidelines for use of nitric oxide.

Authors:  L Foubert; B Fleming; R Latimer; M Jonas; A Oduro; C Borland; T Higenbottam
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-06-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Water vapour and carbon dioxide decrease nitric oxide readings.

Authors:  T W van der Mark; E Kort; R J Meijer; D S Postma; G H Koëter
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  Chemiluminescence analysis and nitrogen dioxide measurement.

Authors:  C C Miller
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-01-29       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Effects of humidity and temperature on nitrogen dioxide formation from nitric oxide.

Authors:  K Miyamoto; A Aida; M Nishimura; T Nakano; Y Kawakami; Y Ohmori; S Ando; T Ichida
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-04-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Nitrogen dioxide measurement in breathing systems.

Authors:  A P Goldman; D J Macrae
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-04-02       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Safety requirement for use of inhaled nitric oxide in neonates.

Authors:  M Bouchet; M H Renaudin; C Raveau; J C Mercier; M Dehan; V Zupan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Clinical monitoring of inhaled nitric oxide: comparison of chemiluminescent and electrochemical sensors.

Authors:  P C Etches; M L Harris; R McKinley; N N Finer
Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.