Literature DB >> 12455083

Systematic use of a collagen-based vascular closure device immediately after cardiac catheterization procedures in 1,317 consecutive patients.

Holger Eggebrecht1, Michael Haude, Uta Woertgen, Axel Schmermund, Clemens von Birgelen, Christoph Naber, Dietrich Baumgart, Christoph Kaiser, Olaf Oldenburg, Thomas Bartel, Knut Kroeger, Raimund Erbel.   

Abstract

Despite recent advances in interventional cardiology, vascular access complications continue to be a significant problem. Conventional manual compression of the femoral access site is associated with prolonged immobilization and significant patient discomfort. We investigated the performance of a collagen-based closure device applied immediately after catheterization and its complication rate in 1,317 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization or coronary angioplasty. Patients undergoing coronary angioplasty (n = 644) received more heparin than patients with diagnostic cardiac catheterization (n = 673; 9,675 +/- 1,144 IU vs. 6,419 +/- 2,211 IU; P < 0.0001). Deployment success rates of the closure device were comparable for patients undergoing diagnostic vs. interventional procedures (95.8% vs. 96.7%; P = 0.46). Complete hemostasis immediately after deployment of the device was achieved in > 90% of all patients, but was lower in the interventional group (93.7% vs. 90.6%; P = 0.05). Major complications including any vascular surgery, major bleeding requiring transfusion, retroperitoneal hematoma, thrombosis or loss of distal pulses, groin infections, significant groin hematoma, and death were observed in 0.53% of all patients, with no differences between diagnostic or interventional patients (0.62% vs. 0.45%; P = 0.953). Subgroup analysis revealed female gender as a predictor of access site complications. Systematic sealing of femoral access sites after both diagnostic and interventional procedures allows for immediate sheath removal with reliable hemostasis. The use of a collagen-based closure device is associated with a low rate of clinically significant complications. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12455083     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Exo-Seal(®) and Angio-Seal (®) for arterial puncture site closure: A randomized, multicenter, single-blind trial.

Authors:  Johannes Ketterle; Harald Rittger; Inga Helmig; Lutz Klinghammer; Stefan Zimmermann; Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt; Johannes Brachmann; Holger Nef; Stephan Achenbach; Christian Schlundt
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Late onset iatrogenic limb ischaemia after deployment of an Angio-Seal vascular closure device.

Authors:  Rama K Krishna; Nisharahmed Kherada; Nirat Beohar
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-04-26

3.  Korean single-center experience with femoral access closure using the ExoSeal device.

Authors:  Yoonhee Han; Jae Hyun Kwon; Surin Park
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-28

4.  Initial experience with Angioseal™: Safety and efficacy of the endovascular closure device.

Authors:  Sachin Modi; Rakesh Gadvi; Suresh Babu
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2013-04

5.  Vascular closure devices after endovascular procedures in swine: a reliable method?

Authors:  P Isfort; T Tanaka; T Penzkofer; P Bruners; R Tolba; C K Kuhl; A H Mahnken
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-03-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.