Literature DB >> 12454818

Classification of low-grade neuroendocrine tumors of midgut and unknown origin.

Susanne Van Eeden1, Pascal F H J Quaedvlieg, Babs G Taal, G Johan A Offerhaus, Cornelis B H W Lamers, Marie-Louise F Van Velthuysen.   

Abstract

Metastasized neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and of unknown origin show a highly variable clinical course. Within this group, low-grade and high-grade malignant tumors can be recognized based on the revised classification of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung, pancreas, and gut published by Capella et al in 1995. The present study investigated whether fine-tuning the prediction of prognosis was possible by dividing the group of low-grade malignant tumors of the midgut and of unknown origin into typical and atypical carcinoids by grading them according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification criteria for neuroendocrine tumors of the lung. Moreover, the prognostic value of immunohistochemical stainings and clinical parameters was evaluated. The study group comprised patients diagnosed between 1983 and 1999 with liver metastases of a neuroendocrine tumor of the midgut n = 40) or of unknown origin (n = 16). As a control for the consistency of grading, 10 patients with metastasized neuroendocrine tumors of the lung also were evaluated. Immunohistochemical stainings for chromogranin A, synaptophysin, Leu 7/CD57, neural cell adhesion molecule/CD56, cytokeratin 8, bcl-2, p53, ki67, and HER2/neu were performed. The clinical parameters age, gender, urinary 5-HIAA level, and presence or absence of the carcinoid syndrome were evaluated. Tumors of the midgut and of unknown origin were evaluated together, because they were clinically similar. In this group of 56 patients, both the Capella and the WHO classification systems recognized the high-grade malignant tumors with a bad prognosis. When the low-grade malignant tumors (Capella) were divided into typical and atypical carcinoids (WHO), no difference in survival was observed, but when the dichotomy into typical and atypical was based on mitotic count alone, the difference became borderline significant (P =.072). Of the immunohistochemical stainings used, synaptophysin, cytokeratin 8, and ki67 had limited prognostic value. Age above 60 was the only clinical parameter of unfavorable prognostic significance. We conclude that high-grade malignant neuroendocrine tumors of the midgut and of unknown origin are recognized by both the Capella classification and the WHO classification of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung. Further subdividing low-grade malignant tumors at this location appears to be of less value than in the lung, but assessing the mitotic activity of these tumors might be of prognostic value. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12454818     DOI: 10.1053/hupa.2002.129204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  30 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of storage and exocytosis in neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Manfred Gratzl; Martin Breckner; Christian Prinz
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.943

2.  Duodenal gangliocytic paraganglioma showing lymph node metastasis: a rare case report.

Authors:  Yoichiro Okubo; Tomoyuki Yokose; Masaru Tuchiya; Aki Mituda; Megumi Wakayama; Chikako Hasegawa; Daisuke Sasai; Tetsuo Nemoto; Kazutoshi Shibuya
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.644

3.  TNM staging of midgut and hindgut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system.

Authors:  G Rindi; G Klöppel; A Couvelard; P Komminoth; M Körner; J M Lopes; A-M McNicol; O Nilsson; A Perren; A Scarpa; J-Y Scoazec; B Wiedenmann
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Diagnosis and treatment in intestinal carcinoid tumors.

Authors:  Babs G Taal
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-02

5.  A retrospective review of 126 high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  James D Smith; Diane L Reidy; Karyn A Goodman; Jinru Shia; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Management of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumours - 10 years experience at a district general hospital.

Authors:  Shridhar S Dronamraju; Vickram B Joypaul
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-06

7.  Reassessing the grade of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  David S Klimstra
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 8.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine and carcinoid tumors: what's new, what's old, and what's different?

Authors:  Diane Reidy-Lagunes; Raymond Thornton
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  A simplified prognostic system for resected pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Nikiforos Ballian; Agnes G Loeffler; Victoria Rajamanickam; Peter A Norstedt; Sharon M Weber; Clifford S Cho
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 10.  Endoscopic resection of an ampullary carcinoid presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Nooman Gilani; Francisco C Ramirez
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.